Jump to content

How not to park when visiting the canal


Tim Lewis

Featured Posts

15 minutes ago, Peanut said:

So it has to be a woman driver then, men never do things like that.

 

Could have been either, obviously.

 

My money however, would be on it being a .....

 

"they".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Info from my mate whose hireboat was moored just down from the bridge. The passenger did actually fall out, and presumably landed in the canal, as they were uninjured.  The occupants of the hireboat slept through whole thing.

 

MP.

 

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alan de Enfield said:

 

Or, it could have been any one of the other 25 genders.

A person who identifies as a driver ?

 

Well they know the car, do they know the driver and do they know who caused it to happen?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ditchcrawler said:

Well they know the car, do they know the driver and do they know who caused it to happen?

 

 

No doubt there will be a 6 month investigation so that 20 different people can justify their pointless jobs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very lucky there. People have drowned in cars which fell in canals..

 

The bridge seems a bit nackered that crack on the left looks like preexisting damage. 

 

Seems this exact thing has happened before judging by the new bricks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, magnetman said:

The bridge seems a bit nackered that crack on the left looks like preexisting damage. 

 

What's the difference between "existing damage" and "preexisting damage"?

 

Is it anything like "ordering" a new product and "pre-ordering" it? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The crack in the bridge is there at this moment in time therefore it is "existing" at the current moment, which is after the incident with the motorcar. 

 

If it had been there before the incident with the motorcar it would be "preexisting" in the sense that it was not caused by the motorcar but was already there. 

 

 

 

 

 

The crack in the bridge is there at this moment in time therefore it is "existing" at the current moment, which is after the incident with the motorcar. 

 

If it had been there before the incident with the motorcar it would be "preexisting" in the sense that it was not caused by the motorcar but was already there. 

 

 

 

 

 

existing
/ɪɡˈzɪstɪŋ/
 
adjective
  1. in existence or operation at the current time.
    "opponents of the existing political system"
     
    -----------
     
     
    pre-exist
    /ˌpriːɪɡˈzɪst,ˌpriːɛɡˈzɪst/
     
    verb
    gerund or present participle: preexisting
    1. exist at or from an earlier time.
      "the statute does no more than restore what pre-existed"
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BEngo said:

Shorely you mean the pre-existing car speed was greater than the existing braking capability?

N

 

There was a pre-existing car as well as pre-existing damage??!!!

 

 

Anyone would think there was a pre-existing bridge, too....

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MtB said:

 

There was a pre-existing car as well as pre-existing damage??!!!

 

 

Anyone would think there was a pre-existing bridge, too....

 

 

 

Surely it means the crack existed before the bridge was built over it?

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.