Leaderboard

As a cyclist, I do find comments like this to be quite embarrassing, there's just no need for it. Unfortunately in all walks of life there are those people who feel they are above the law and they can do whatever they want. I don't know what the answer is, but this Yorkshire cyclist and his mates are always courteous to others when we cycle the towpaths, or the cycle paths, or the roads.

Correct, the overtaker has to avoid the overtaken. I seem to remember having to dismount occasionally when a path is crowded, or there are obstructions, sometimes it's just not possible to continue to cycle, so you stand and wait til the group has passed then continue, but judging from the small sample of cyclists today, I would say that they each have different approaches from behind. Ringing the bell is a start, but some ring and keep going at exactly the same pace so that helps prevent alarm in the pedestrian but only if the cyclist is going slowly. I would approach a pedestrian while slowing down, ring the bell, but then, if you need to stop it is much easier. To ring the bell and overtake rapidly does not allow the pedestrian to process the event or allow the cyclist to determine whether he has been "recognised".

CRT Towpath Code, point 2, states that Pedestrians have priority on our towpaths so cyclists need to be ready to slow down. If you're in a hurry, consider using an alternative route for your journey.

I saw what I assumed to be a new liveaboard on the K&A who aspired to be part of the "community". It was quite a nice traditional type boat with smart paintwork. Boater was painting rough red oxide patches all over it to make it look more like a liveaboard boat. If boat licence is base on value maybe then many boaters will devalue there boats and we will have even more linear slums. There could be a new market in selling "unpolish" to take the shine of shiney boats 😀

Personally I think we should ban both pedestrians and cyclists from towpaths and leave them for horses as originally intended (In all seriousness, when I use a bike on a towpath I generally slow right down to walking pace when passing pedestrians whether they've clearly heard me or not. Towpaths are generally muddy, bumpy and not very wide, and lots of people on them are walking dogs...)

I think my boat is grand. Suits me anyway ...

Let's say bikes were banned on the towpath. Not going to happen but just say. Would it stop people? Nah It's illegal to cycle on the pavement or use a privately owned electric scooter on public roads, but does that stop people? It doesn't stop people who are otherwise law abiding in their life so I doubt whether even those people would be more wary of getting caught by CaRT bods than getting their collar felt by the local constabulary for cycling on the pavement. As for the sheer selfish idiots who cycle like it's the Tour de France or the criminals who ride nicked motorbikes down the towpath, they aren't going to give a merry fig about any 'ban' Don't penalise those who enjoy a safe and leisurely cycle on the towpath just because some people are complete ar****les.

No I don't. Fast moving wheeled vehicles on a narrow path shared with pedestrians with water on one side of it is not an appropriate use of the amenity. There are thousands and thousands of tarmacked roads all over the country where people can cycle and never have pedestrian interaction problems. The cyclists do a "reclaim the streets" thing so why don't walkers do a "reclaim our paths" thing and just disallow bikes or make it awkward for them? It is the wrong mentality for people out walking to be getting out of the way of people cycling. If anything it should be the other way around. Everyone has an objective and a destination. Someone on wheels is going to get there faster so it should be them who delay their journey by dismounting to pass walkers rather than walkers getting out the way of the people on wheels. Its just wrong and doesn't work. My advice for people walking is do NOT respond to aggression by jumping out the way. This is the wrong psychology to be using. Jousting and unseating the enemy using the long shaft could be rewarding. "Awfully sorry old boy I seem to have caught you with my boathook".

that is a scam. The name and address is blank

Personally I would stick on the T&M, heading for Fradley, Alrewas, then maybe as far as Willington.

In my experience so far the vast majority of cyclists behave with courtesy - I've had one incident where I didn't hear the bell (woolly hat over ears and not the best of hearing) - easily resolved with a friendly apology both sides. And had one incident where a cyclist came through a bridge quite quickly not realising I was there with the pooch. Again easily resolved with a friendly word on both sides. Hopefully it continues to be so.

I boat and cycle towpaths and I always slow down, ring bell, and take extra care when passing pedestrians. Just seems to be common courtesy as they have the right of way?

Yearly licence to be 10 percent of boat value. Lets encourage some starter boats. Boats valued yearly by a professional. £100 fee. Not the end of the world. So if your boat is a grand you pay £100. A hundred grand and you pay £10k. Seems quite sensible to me.

I did the equivalent with my neighbour's endlessly barking dog which started howling when he went to work and stoped when he came in from the pub. Mentioned it politely, got told to go forth and multiply. Rigged up the band's PA against the adjoining wall, recorded his dog howling one day, stuck it on a tape loop, turned it up full volume at midnight and went and stayed at a friend's house for the night. Dog vanished two days later. Mind you, he never spoke to me again, either, so double win.

Andrew would want it filled in and turned into cycle ways.

What we really need is more signs. One sign every two or three hundred metres reminding cyclists to "Cut your pace, share the space" or something like that. That should help. If it doesn't, then the signs must be too far apart and more should be erected.

But if there was a recognised maximum cycling speed, it would also allow prosecutions based on the cyclist's own data. Once again, there is no incentive to try anything a bit radical. It is cheaper and easier to allow, for instance, an old age pensioner to be knocked down and hospitalised with no cost to the cyclist. Furious riding I think is already an offence, but the police find it cheaper to ignore it.

Odd this. I have always found cyclists on the Calder & Hebble to be far and away the most polite and courteous on the network. Maybe being a six foot hairy bloke helps, but I think my usual practice of twirling the handspike like a quarterstaff is the main reason.

the number of tings and the rapididity of the repetitition is a good indicator of how much of an idiot a cyclist is likely to be. I was told that part of the problem is smartphone apps which upload stats from riders. Point being that the keen cyclists will be more likely to have a higher average speed and also be uploading their data. =problem because the app will then tell other users the towpath is a fast transit option.

No, wasn't contradicting you or thinking you wouldn't. There will always be selfish cyclists who rip along like they're in a velodrome There will always be selfish dog walkers who think that their animal should be allowed to terrorise others There will always be selfish fisherman who think they shouldn't have to pull in their rods And there will always be selfish boaters out there who think that....well we can think of a hundred answers to that one!

You really do know how to be intolerant, don't you? Yeah, cyclists on roads don't have pedestrian interaction problems. But they do have vehicle interaction problems, which regularly kill them. Over the years I've had several friends badly injured, and one ex-keen-cyclist who is depressed and doesn't cycle any more after a near-death experience. But I suppose this doesn't matter to you, a few dead cyclists just keep the numbers down, it's Darwinism in action? (I could point out that many *many* times more cyclists are killed or injured by cars than pedestrians by cyclists, but presumably that doesn't matter to you) I agree, don't respond to aggressive cyclists by jumping out of the way. But if the path is wide enough for you to step to one side -- or just not walk down the middle! -- to let a cyclist past who has slowed down and warned you of their approach, why not do it -- is it really such a hardship to have any kind of give-and-take in your life instead of digging your heels in and "standing up for your rights" like the Daily Wail loves to see?

You'll always get entitled idiots who think that the world revolves around them and rules don't apply. About five years ago I was pushing my old mountain bike through Woodley tunnel (lower peak forest) with the front light on. Coming in the opposite direction is another cyclist yelling to get out of the way. Yep with a tunnel wall one side and a steel barrier on the canal side of towpath. I just stopped walking and a MAMIL (Middle aged man in lycra) ploughs into me in the darkness. Just behind him is his ladyfriend/wife/other who then proceeds to verbally tear him a new one for being an inconsiderate idiot and not getting off his bike. Think he did a bit of damage to his shiny new expensive two wheeler, just for good measure. All a bit surreal in the middle of a dark tunnel.

The worst one that happened to me was around Croxley on the GU. I was cycling along when I approached a dog walker with a small dog on a lead, but the woman had no control of it. I slowly cycled past on the wide grassy bit letting them have the towpath when suddenly the dog decided to shoot out right in front of my front wheel. It was a fairly new bike with sharpish brakes which I applied instantly. I of course flew over the handlebars and had a soft landing on the grass to be greeted by a small dog licking my face. 🤣

It could work. I’m not really bothered either. I already have a mooring off crt’s water. I’m just trying to get a bit of cruising in before the network collapse’s completely. Any massive increase is going to cause massive evasion. So they probably won’t end up collecting anymore money in the end.

According to this CRT website........https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/enjoy-the-waterways/cycling/cycling-faqs . pedestrians do have priority which in my book means that pedestrians on the towpath are the most important users and cyclists must slow down for them. That doesn't mean that pedestrians have right of way as the vast majority of towpaths are not public rights of way. Bottom line is that there are some totally ignorant cyclists on the towpaths as there totally ignorant pedestrians, joggers etc. I cannot see CRT doing anything about bad cyclists, or anyone else bad on the towpaths, apart from flagging the rules as they have done on the website that I linked....... This link is from the CRT website "Stay Kind Slow Down." https://canalrivertrust.org.uk/donate/our-campaigns/stay-kind-slow-down/faqs

Deaf as I am, and worse after a day above the engine, I can't hear bike bells although I don't think many cyclists bother with them anyway. The frequency is too high for my ears - I can't hear most birdsong or the dishwasher telling me it's done its stuff. I tend to lurch a bit these days when walking, too, and work on the principle that a cyclist is just going to have to get round me. Me and the stick take up a fair bit of space. Back home on a walkway between houses, I did put a cyclist into the hedge a month or so back. Not intentionally, she was belting round a blind corner in the dark, no lights, I never saw or heard her coming. She saw me at the last moment, swerved, and crash. Didn't get any sympathy. My right ear hasnt worked properly for fifty years, so I don't get stereo or directions.

I didn't say the cyclist in your case was in the right, I said that both cyclists and pedestrians have equal rights to use the towpath, pedestrians don't have right of way -- and neither do cyclists. Aggressive or ignorant/stupid behaviour is wrong no matter which side it comes from. In your case it indeed sounds as if the blame was with the cyclist -- but if they were "ringing a bell for ages" and you took no notice (or didn't hear) and didn't move to let them past (assuming these was room...) then they could have good reason for getting annoyed with you -- but then cyclists need to allow for pedestrians who may be hard of hearing too. There are two sides to every story... 😉

Oilway blanking plug in there? I think the slot is unimportant. Same part used on a different engine or did BMC need a bit of steel that shape elsewhere?

Actually, they seem to be pulling out of the joint ventures that build these houses and investing the proceeds, if any, in property or diversified assets. If you read the small print, it says that the numbers include sites where CRT has disposed of its interest

This is how we brought our barge in Belgium. It’s seems that following this thread and other on here that proof of boat ownership or of it being free of debt is a minefield and surely it is time for a registration scheme but not SSR as this is very loose with no checks. The monetary value of quite humble narrow boats certainly makes it open to scammers especially with the people desperate to find somewhere to live who have zero knowledge apart from watching some U tube channel. Over 60 years we brought 3 nbs and had one built, the one from British Waterways came with no paperwork except a receipt and likewise the one from Willow Wren but it was fair to assume they owned them the private one was well known and had been in the same ownership for years. The barge in Belgium was the only one we had a survey on as it was 80 years old and had obviously been a bit neglected as well as having little knowledge of these craft. The surveyor found some thin places and the need for a new shaft and bearings which the owner (as per the contract) has the option of putting right or we had the option of pulling out with our deposit returned. The owner had some of the work put right and a sum was deducted from the final payment for the other bits to be put right later.

With the butty on cross straps on empty working boats tight bends are if anything easier than with a single motor. You initially move the tiller to start the turn, then the weight of the butty pushes it further round - the motor steerer utimately has to steer 'out of the turn' to stop being pushed too far and to snatch the butty fore-end round. This will not be much different for pleasure craft - if there is a steerer on the towed boat make sure he does not attempt to put his rudder over to steer round the turn at that initial point or he will simply stop the 'tug' getting round. You need to have the mind-set that the towed boat effectively acts as a rudder in that situation. 'Narrows' would only be a challenge if it means they are too narrow for boats to pass each other. If you meet the gravel barge when it is loaded you will need to try to be as close to him as you can, as the pressure wave from his bow will push you sideways away, and if you are already right over at the edge of your channel that would give you problems. If the towed boat is on cross straps that makes it more difficult for the 'tug' to get clear of the shallows at the edge. It is also fatal to assume you should ease right off to tick-over when meeting or, God forbend, to go into neutral. You only have steerage while you have a decent amount of power on. Tam

As you know they 'fully identified' the money tree they would be using - however, their lack of horticultural skills in growing the identified money tree meant that they actually spent more money employing an ever growing group of aborculturalists, nurturing and maintaining said money, tree than the money tree ever produced. It appears that they may have chosen the wrong species of money tree, (there are other varieties available which may bear more fruit).

Finished article in situ, worked out well for just two of us to sit at. It’s not perfect (should have double checked table saw for square) and I think I would possibly rout the profile after assembly if doing again. It’ll do until I can find some white oak at a Yorkshire price

And the increase in size of the boat is also proportional to the number of people watching.....

CASTLEFORD!! its a wonder you didnt get the gas fittings stripped!!