Jump to content

SteveLevis

Member
  • Posts

    57
  • Joined

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

SteveLevis's Achievements

Engager

Engager (3/12)

30

Reputation

  1. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  2. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  3. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  4. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  5. ..yes, hydraulic drive not gearbox...my bad. In general the hydraulic drive itself was reliable, but the one time we did have a problem the unit had to go to Peachments for repair and from memory this took a few weeks, so no cruising, (syndicate boat). There probably are advantages to having a hydraulic drive, (eg no stern gland to grease), but I prefer the simplicity of a drive shaft...
  6. Our last boat was a Hexagon built (Polish), boat which had a Nanni engine with hydraulic drive. In general the engine was excellent, however initially we did have some problems with the hydraulic drive, (a leak), that took a while to get sorted. The hydraulic drive did seem to be quieter than a convention shaft, but they are not as fuel efficient as a shaft drive, (probably about 75%??), so you will use more fuel. Also I think "AR Peachement" are the only company that deal with the hydraulic gearboxes..(I could be wrong). If it has bow / stern thrusters that are hydraulic the recommendation is that you change the hydraulic pipes at around 10 years, (not cheap, but would be a right mess if the pipes "burst"). If I was getting another boat I personally would not get one with a hydraulic drive...
  7. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  8. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  9. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  10. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  11. ..ta for the replies...all thhings being equal I think we will be "turning left / going straight on" at Fradley up the T&M then turn around sometime at around 3 days. (Canal planner suggesting a turn around at Stenson Lock No.6 winding hole).
  12. Hi all, Just looking for suggestions really regarding an upcoming trip from Stone heading South for a total of 6 days, (3 out and 3 back)? As I see it there are 3 main options:- 1/ Turn right on Shropshire Ubion and head towards Wolverhampton, 2/ Carry straight on and turn right at Fradley and down the Coventry canal turning around just above Atherstone. 3/ South and then turn left at Fradley and head up the trent and Mersey for a bit? Any recommendations welcome.
  13. I boat and cycle towpaths and I always slow down, ring bell, and take extra care when passing pedestrians. Just seems to be common courtesy as they have the right of way?
  14. ..if you are "local" to the boat and don't mind a bit of hassle you might as well sell privately and save the commision...? I am sure that if the price is right you will shift it easily, particularly around the spring time...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.