Jump to content

"Unique swing railway bridge over the Thames saved after years of neglect"


David Mack

Featured Posts

22 minutes ago, Athy said:

I hope it wasn't used too often: it must have been labour-intensive, what with having to install and them remove the fishplates each time a rain crossed it.

 

Looking at the paint finish on the gears in the video, it doesn't look as though it has been operated more than about once since spending the £1m restoring it. 

 

I know there are no railway lines either side but it seems a shame not to be having demonstration days at least!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Athy said:

I hope it wasn't used too often: it must have been labour-intensive, what with having to install and them remove the fishplates each time a rain crossed it.

 

It was not unusual to have railway swing bridges that required a team of men to unbolt fish plates an to reinstate them afterwards.  Also it was probably the case that signalling wires had to be detached, and then set up again afterwards.

 

Without thinking too hard, I can come up with two examples on fairly famous crossings.

 

1) Langstone Bridge on the crossing to Hayling Island from the mainland., (bridge long since closed).

 

2) Barmouth Bridge spanning the Mawddach estuary, (railway line still open, but swing bridge not still operational).

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At over over £1m, one might just ask why? I would suggest that if restoration or conservation was really necessary, there are a good number number of heritage railway workshops that could have done that job for a fraction of the cost and been glad of the work,

Edited by NB Alnwick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Athy said:

I hope it wasn't used too often: it must have been labour-intensive, what with having to install and them remove the fishplates each time a rain crossed it.

 

That could have been us on that 1970s video, though sadly  it isn't.  I remember spending quite a bit of time wandering around the sidings looking for someone to open the bridge for us....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seem to recall that in the 70s and before it was opened when required for boat traffic so was closed for most of the time. Remember, especially in the late 60s and early 70s a narrow boat on the Thames attracted spectators they were so rarer. Only   maybe 2 or so a year past Maidenhead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony Brooks said:

I seem to recall that in the 70s and before it was opened when required for boat traffic so was closed for most of the time. Remember, especially in the late 60s and early 70s a narrow boat on the Thames attracted spectators they were so rarer. Only   maybe 2 or so a year past Maidenhead.

Yes, you are right. Even at weekends it was normally closed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 23/12/2022 at 10:00, Athy said:

I hope it wasn't used too often: it must have been labour-intensive, what with having to install and them remove the fishplates each time a rain crossed it.

 Canal guides of the 60s and 70s recommended navigation via Duke's Cut due to the delays whilst waiting for this bridge to be opened 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, magpie patrick said:

 

 Canal guides of the 60s and 70s recommended navigation via Duke's Cut due to the delays whilst waiting for this bridge to be opened 

 

One wonders why it is (was) a swing bridge at all give the presence of the alternative route off the Thames onto the Oxford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, David Mack said:

Public right of navigation?

 

I was more wondering about why, when they built the Oxford, they cut two channels to the Thames. Presumably one was not enough. 

 

Or did they cut Duke's Cut because the damned swing bridge was kept in the closed position and delayed the carrying boats, perhaps? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MtB said:

 

I was more wondering about why, when they built the Oxford, they cut two channels to the Thames. Presumably one was not enough. 

 

Or did they cut Duke's Cut because the damned swing bridge was kept in the closed position and delayed the carrying boats, perhaps? 

The Duke's cut was built by the Duke of Marlborough in 1789, not part of the Oxford canal I think. Built to link to Upper Thames and to Wolvercote Mill. Many years before the railway..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Dukes Cut was a link between the Oxford Canal and the Thames north of Oxford. This crossing railway bridge, started as the Buckinghamshire Railway was part of one of the London & Birmingham Railway extensions that terminated at Rewley Road but also made the junction with the Oxford, Worcester & Wolverhampton Railway. The Oxford Branch became part of the London & North Western Railway during construction. And yes Robert Stephenson was the engineer. Full marks to the narrator for that! There was also a branch railway to Banbury. and presently part of the line is under reconstruction.

 

It is however hard to call this bridge unique as swing bridges exist elsewhere over navigations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Heartland said:

The Dukes Cut was a link between the Oxford Canal and the Thames north of Oxford. This crossing railway bridge, started as the Buckinghamshire Railway was part of one of the London & Birmingham Railway extensions that terminated at Rewley Road but also made the junction with the Oxford, Worcester & Wolverhampton Railway. The Oxford Branch became part of the London & North Western Railway during construction. And yes Robert Stephenson was the engineer. Full marks to the narrator for that! There was also a branch railway to Banbury. and presently part of the line is under reconstruction.

 

It is however hard to call this bridge unique as swing bridges exist elsewhere over navigations.

Inverness, Selby, Goole, Hull, Boston, Norwich. Vazon is a sliding not a swing bridge. Sutton Bridge no longer carries a railway. 

 

Disused lift bridges at Keadby, Deptford Creek.

 

Any more??

Edited by Scholar Gypsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.