I think that if you're going to 'report' on something like the breach then it should be educational and impartial. It isn't the latest events in Eastenders or something which isn't real.

You do realist the entire purpose of these videos is to get clicks (because clicks=money), and more sensationalism=more clicks plus (hopefully) more people forwarding it to their mates saying "Wow, look at this!" ? They're not doing it to provide an impartial factual information service, they're doing to to make money... 😉 (and there's nothing wrong with that, it's a perfectly normal way to make a living nowadays, along with being an "influencer"...)

Burnham claims there was Russian interference in the Brexit referendum. I am guessing the Russian government didn't believe in the sunlit uplands and thought it would damage the UK and the rump EU. Of course, it is impossible to prove one way, or the other, as with any other "intelligence" stories about an official enemy. Any Brexiteers prepared to admit they were a Russian asset? Anyone else who, campaigned for Brexit now feeling a bit of a mug because they missed the chance to get paid too? Worth putting your timesheet into the Russian embassy, before the next payroll run. BBC NewsBurnham says it is 'clear' Russia interfered with Brexit...The prime minister says voters were not "sufficiently" informed about how foreign actors sought to disrupt UK democracy.

As good as the video might be I tend to steer clear of any video with a headline that contain words like "Massive", "Huge", "Guess what..." and "You'll never believe..." as it is all just clickbait nonsense. I wish people on Youtube would just present the facts and stop trying to over sensationalise everything.