Jump to content

Diesel Vs Electric


Fly Navy

Featured Posts

On 08/02/2019 at 12:35, ditchcrawler said:

If the speed limit on motorways was reduced to 55 mph and policed it would cut pollution drastically and save  loadt of fuel and cash.

If 4mph is a good enough speed limit on canals, then it is good enough for the motorways and other roads too. Bring back the person with the red flag walking in front of every vehicle. Cut pollution, accidents and unemployment all at once!

 

Jen ?

Who, if there is any doubt, is joking. Mostly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/02/2019 at 11:33, mrsmelly said:

Whilst its nice to see how passionate Peter is about leccy cars, in reality in 2019 they are a non starter for any but the few who live with easy charging and dont go anywhere/far. My regular trips vary between 135 miles thats the shortest to my mums and 500 miles and every thing inbetween. I do this easily with a 1k car in comfort. Even if people bought expensive leccy cars that love throwing money away its not possible to do this type of motoring that millions of us do. All these quoted distances that leccy cars can do in reality will be way less. Today for instance its cold overcast with plenty of rain How far in REALITY will a standard leccy car go at motorway speed with headlights, wipers and heater blower on?? you will not find the result from any car manufacturer either. Add in the fact that some cars will do a particular trip with a couple of miles to spare but then what happens when the inevitable accident happens on the motorway and its closed and its cold wet and raining with stop start moving for say two hours or more ( we have all been there ) how long is it before heater, lights and motor simply jack in? what then especialy if there are thousands of us? spare battery somewhere like yer five litre can of petrol? So you can spend huge amounts on a leccy car with an internal combustion engine with it to charge the batteries !!  ? viable all leccy cars have not happened yet and it aint happening anytime soon.

Couldn't agree more. Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, peterboat said:

Why not?

 

Come on Peter, I'm sure you already know the answer. ?

 

Peak demand in the UK usually occurs on winters nights. When it is cold the weather tends to be still, so neither solar nor wind generators are effective then.

 

If we want truly reliable renewable energy, then we must do as Denmark has done and invest in wave power.

 

However it costs an order of magnitude moved them wind or solar, so our politicians have gone for the cheaper option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cuthound said:

 

Come on Peter, I'm sure you already know the answer. ?

 

Peak demand in the UK usually occurs on winters nights. When it is cold the weather tends to be still, so neither solar nor wind generators are effective then.

 

If we want truly reliable renewable energy, then we must do as Denmark has done and invest in wave power.

 

However it costs an order of magnitude moved them wind or solar, so our politicians have gone for the cheaper option.

I think you need to look towards our shores, turbines are appearing all the time, and they dont stop spinning. I sailed half way around the world years ago and in all that distance only had one day with no wind. I was reading that the Danish, French and us are just getting ready to put up the biggest off shore wind farm in the world, Big enough for all of the UKs needs. We are moving on and fossil fuels will figure less and less in the calculations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, peterboat said:

I think you need to look towards our shores, turbines are appearing all the time, and they dont stop spinning. I sailed half way around the world years ago and in all that distance only had one day with no wind. I was reading that the Danish, French and us are just getting ready to put up the biggest off shore wind farm in the world, Big enough for all of the UKs needs. We are moving on and fossil fuels will figure less and less in the calculations

 

Yes sea mounted wind turbines generate more electricity than land based ones, but even they don't work in calm weather.

 

Why do you think the electricity companies have TRIAD periods every winter, whereby the pay those with diesel generators handsomely to run them during the three highest peak periods?

 

We are still a long way off being able to generate enough electricity without being reliant on fossil fuels in this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cuthound said:

 

Yes sea mounted wind turbines generate more electricity than land based ones, but even they don't work in calm weather.

 

Why do you think the electricity companies have TRIAD periods every winter, whereby the pay those with diesel generators handsomely to run them during the three highest peak periods?

 

We are still a long way off being able to generate enough electricity without being reliant on fossil fuels in this country.

Honestly I believe very quickly we will have spare production from wind turbines, the chances of their being no wind around all of our island is very slim, and the turbines will be all around us very soon.

Lets be honest anything has to be better than the continual pollution from fossil fuels.

Edited by peterboat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, peterboat said:

Honestly I believe very quickly we will have spare production from wind turbines, the chances of their being no wind around all of out island is very slim, and the turbines will be all around us very soon

Do you believe in the tooth fairy as well 

 

 

 

 

;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, cuthound said:

 

Yes sea mounted wind turbines generate more electricity than land based ones, but even they don't work in calm weather.

 

Why do you think the electricity companies have TRIAD periods every winter, whereby the pay those with diesel generators handsomely to run them during the three highest peak periods?

 

We are still a long way off being able to generate enough electricity without being reliant on fossil fuels in this country.

The problem won’t be having enough turbines for normal weather conditions but what do do when there is no wind.  I think 4 things will all happen

1. Smart meters that have an energy price that is so high during ‘no wind’ days that people will only use essential appliances until generation restarts.

2.  Battery banks to cope for short period surges in demand - eg half time during football.  These will include electric cars as well as large banks.

3. Indirect energy storage, so energy stored during periods of surplus eg pumping water up a mountain or making hydrogen both of which can run turbines for a while.

4. Highly insulated houses using far less energy than today.

 

 

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jen-in-Wellies said:

If 4mph is a good enough speed limit on canals, then it is good enough for the motorways and other roads too. Bring back the person with the red flag walking in front of every vehicle. Cut pollution, accidents and unemployment all at once!
?

 

Wouldnt work.

Pollution would increase because you would run your engine 15 times longer to do your trips with the engine working in an uneconomic mode. Unemployment would rise drastically as everyone would be late for work so get sacked.....and I am bound to have some accidents as I wont get home in time to go to the loo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, peterboat said:

Honestly I believe very quickly we will have spare production from wind turbines, the chances of their being no wind around all of our island is very slim, and the turbines will be all around us very soon.

Lets be honest anything has to be better than the continual pollution from fossil fuels.

O the number of days I have waited for a helicopter and not been able to see the handrail for fog when I worked Offshore. Maybe the whole Country being effected at one time is rear, but you cant even have it happen for one day if you dont want the Country to come to a standstill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chewbacka said:

The problem won’t be having enough turbines for normal weather conditions but what do do when there is no wind.  I think 4 things will all happen

1. Smart meters that have an energy price that is so high during ‘no wind’ days that people will only use essential appliances until generation restarts.

2.  Battery banks to cope for short period surges in demand - eg half time during football.  These will include electric cars as well as large banks.

3. Indirect energy storage, so energy stored during periods of surplus eg pumping water up a mountain or making hydrogen both of which can run turbines for a while.

4. Highly insulated houses using far less energy than today.

 

 

You are providing answers, answers that other boaters should know the answers to, because we are mostly using batteries in our daily lives. Some people just want to see the impossible which disappoints me, its a shame that pollution is global, because if we could make the greatest polluters, suffer the consequences the most, maybe they would think about their action before doing them.

As I have said before I am at an age where I will live to be old, a lot of the gross polluters will live and die a miserable existence  because of their actions, just a shame that the innocents will suffer along with them?

Edited by peterboat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, peterboat said:

I think you need to look towards our shores, turbines are appearing all the time, and they dont stop spinning. I sailed half way around the world years ago and in all that distance only had one day with no wind. I was reading that the Danish, French and us are just getting ready to put up the biggest off shore wind farm in the world, Big enough for all of the UKs needs. We are moving on and fossil fuels will figure less and less in the calculations

They do stop spinning, they produce about 25 / 30% of their rated capacity. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CompairHolman said:

They do stop spinning, they produce about 25 / 30% of their rated capacity. 

 

 

On a farm local to me are six of them, the farm belongs to Mick Longford who I have known for 49 years, I have chatted to him about them over a pint a few times, he always has one spinning to supply his farm it was part of the deal. As for the rest well if you dont need the energy they turn them off saves wearing out expensive machinery for nowt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ditchcrawler said:

O the number of days I have waited for a helicopter and not been able to see the handrail for fog when I worked Offshore. Maybe the whole Country being effected at one time is rear, but you cant even have it happen for one day if you dont want the Country to come to a standstill.

 

Maybe Peter thinks the remaining working wind turbo as will blow the fog away from the moribund ones ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dr Bob said:

Wouldnt work.

Pollution would increase because you would run your engine 15 times longer to do your trips with the engine working in an uneconomic mode. Unemployment would rise drastically as everyone would be late for work so get sacked.....and I am bound to have some accidents as I wont get home in time to go to the loo.

you're ignoring the side effect.   Because it would no longer be practical to make frequent or long journeys peeps would work from home wherever possible, and live closer to work where it isn't.  Recreational journeys would be vastly reduced.  Shopping and other essential journeys would be better planned to incorporate as much as possible in one trip.

 

fewer miles, less pollution, less congestion, less stress.

 

 

Edited by Murflynn
  • Greenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was very little most lived locally to their work and cars were a luxury not a right.  Unfortunately the planet can not sustain the levels of personal movement we currently have in the West.  Add in the rest of the world all quite reasonably wanting the same and the environmental destruction to mine all the copper, iron, lithium, rare earths etc etc   will be massive.  It is just not sustainable.

  • Greenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chewbacka said:

When I was very little most lived locally to their work and cars were a luxury not a right.  Unfortunately the planet can not sustain the levels of personal movement we currently have in the West.  Add in the rest of the world all quite reasonably wanting the same and the environmental destruction to mine all the copper, iron, lithium, rare earths etc etc   will be massive.  It is just not sustainable.

exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, cuthound said:

 

Maybe Peter thinks the remaining working wind turbo as will blow the fog away from the moribund ones ?

I havent seen fog in years! wind blows it all away ?

6 hours ago, Chewbacka said:

When I was very little most lived locally to their work and cars were a luxury not a right.  Unfortunately the planet can not sustain the levels of personal movement we currently have in the West.  Add in the rest of the world all quite reasonably wanting the same and the environmental destruction to mine all the copper, iron, lithium, rare earths etc etc   will be massive.  It is just not sustainable.

What about the environmental destruction to get oil/gas and then use it? very shortly it will lead to the end of life as we know it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, peterboat said:

I havent seen fog in years! wind blows it all away ?

What about the environmental destruction to get oil/gas and then use it? very shortly it will lead to the end of life as we know it

 

There is such a thing as weather that is both windy and foggy - counter-intuitive, I know, but I have expereinced it.

 

The whole point about renewables is that they are making a bigger and bigger contribution to the energy mix. Every MW generated by a turbine is a MW that didn't need generating from a fossil fuel.  AFAIK nobody is saying we will ever get to 100% renewables 100% of the time, but there is no reason at all why we shouldn't be able to get a lot closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.