Jump to content

vexatious. .....

Guest

By Guest
in General Boating

 Share

Featured Posts

nicknorman Veteran II

nicknormanDonate to Canal World

Posted
Posted

Yup, but you get the drift.

(Spelling correction is bad form BTW)

Not when it's a rehash of a rehash of a thread which is causing the mods and owner some difficulty. Under the circumstances I'd say it's vexatious rehashing. In accordance with NM's latest, why not just allow a little while for the position and rules of this game to be established by Dan?

  • Greenie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Not when it's a rehash of a rehash of a thread which is causing the mods and owner some difficulty. Under the circumstances I'd say it's vexatious rehashing. In accordance with NM's latest, why not just allow a little while for the position and rules of this game to be established by Dan?

Exactly...

 

And now he has tied somebody else up..

 

 

As I said vexatious.....

 

He's lovin' it.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gaggle Influencer

gaggle

Posted
Posted

Dan ought to consider the vexatious constant complaints against Nigel and Allen on here by a couple of posters , was it the mods who first took exception to the threads by Nigel or did others put in complaints after they became overly concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lady Muck Veteran

Lady Muck

Posted
Posted (edited)

I think we all ought to give Dan a bit of time and space think about this. And because he actually has a life outside of the internet (Jealous? Moi?) , things might not be actioned immediately.

And what RWLP says. If it's that urgent or important to you, what's stopping anyone hosting a discussion themselves?

Edited by Lady Muck
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NigelMoore Veteran

NigelMoore

Posted
Posted

Not when it's a rehash of a rehash of a thread which is causing the mods and owner some difficulty. Under the circumstances I'd say it's vexatious rehashing. In accordance with NM's latest, why not just allow a little while for the position and rules of this game to be established by Dan?

 

I find myself delighted to finally be in a position to give nicknorman one of those ‘green’ accolades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

Martin, why don't you email the mods and see if they can change the thread title to correct your spelling/typing error?

 

No need it seems they already have without being asked, thanks mods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
matty40s Veteran II

matty40s

Posted
Posted (edited)

For someone that thinks

 

Agreed, if I was a mod on here I would have removed the thread purely on the basis it was just so bloody boring..

 

and

 

Feel free to find it interesting......if it gets put back up...

 

is it not a bit strange that the same person not only posts probably 20% of the posts on the subsequent thread and then starts a new thread when the last one gets locked........

 

Edited by matty40s
  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

For someone that thinks

 

Agreed, if I was a mod on here I would have removed the thread purely on the basis it was just so bloody boring..

 

and

 

Feel free to find it interesting......if it gets put back up...

 

is it not a bit strange that the same person not only posts probably 20% of the posts on the subsequent thread and then starts a new thread when the last one gets locked........

 

 

Not really whilst I don't find the subject interesting I find the motives behind it very interesting - as I said I used to deal with people like this in my working life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted (edited)

That reminds me of a Sally Ash comment at a boaters meeting where she was trying to railroad something disastrous through and met a lot of knowledgable, intelligent and passionate responses.

"We're (BW collective) not used to dealing with people like you!"

 

It may do - however my context in using the term is different. My reference was to a very very small group of people who seemed to delight in making a nuisance of themselves. I guess there was less than a handful I came across in my whole career. That is different from a larger collective which is what I take your post as referring to.

 

It was rare but ultimately we had the ability within our complaints procedure to disengage with them and cease responding in any way. I don't know if CRT are able to invoke the same.

Edited by The Dog House
Link to comment
Share on other sites
churchward Veteran II

churchward

Posted
Posted

Can anyone summarise in a sentence or two what this is all about? unsure.png

 

cheers, Pete.

~smpt~

It's all about opening a thread here that allows those that can't just leave it alone and want to go on and on and on and on about another thread that has been closed by the mods.

 

Will that do?

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
smileypete Veteran II

smileypete

Posted
Posted (edited)

From a quick skim it seems that someone has a bone to pick with CaRT (rightly or wrongly) related to a court case and the forum is ending up serving as a platform in some way...

 

Might it be better if they started a blog on the web and linked to it from a forum post? Would make life much easier for Dan as any possible future legal implications won't impact on the forum.

 

cheers, Pete.

~smpt~

Edited by smileypete
  • Greenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.