Jump to content

Paul C

Member
  • Posts

    12,221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Paul C last won the day on October 16 2016

Paul C had the most liked content!

3 Followers

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

17,063 profile views

Paul C's Achievements

Veteran II

Veteran II (12/12)

1k

Reputation

  1. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  2. Definitely. Just as, you can be "banned" from your local Tesco; or you can go to a car dealer but they don't/won't sell you the car you want to buy etc.
  3. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  4. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  5. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  6. There's two answers: one is a motorhome and the other is a boat - it could be argued that being a motorhome squarely puts it into "chattel" category, and it is not considered for council tax to be levied on it. One could cite the fact that motorhomes predominantly do move, quite extensively, compared to boats which often end up not moving for long periods of time. The other answer is, there is no difference and they may seek to charge council tax on people who reside in motorhomes, which may very well have a negative knock-on effect for those with larger, and eventually smaller, motorhomes too.
  7. What's your address? I mean, don't type it out, but do you have a land-based address that isn't the mooring? Its a pointer in the right direction, but ultimately its the valuation office at the council who determine if council tax is due. You'd think it were linked to planning permission, or housing benefit, or whatever, but it isn't (officially). The "stay at the moorings 3 days/week" maximum rule - who sets this? Your mooring provider? It sounds like its a non-residential mooring and they apply that rule to demonstrate compliance.
  8. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  9. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  10. Why? Uber themselves didn't do it. The drivers are self-employed. No doubt the driver (if it indeed was his fault....) could be, but I suspect an insurance payout has already been done for the physical damage.
  11. Using a car once a week, for a run that does 7-10 miles (so it warms up fully) and does about 40mph (so it uses all the gears) is pretty much ideal. The issue with low mileage cars is they may have been stood for a long time, and things like suspension rubber bushes, tyres etc degrade worse like this. But then most cars which aren't new, and even them before its first owner gets it, will have stood at some point.
  12. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  13. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  14. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  15. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.