Ray T Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 https://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2020/01/15/bridge-damaged-after-suspected-stolen-car-crashes-into-police-vehice/
MtB Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 I like the brick stuck in the car's teeth.... 1
Dr Bob Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 The moral of this story is don't park by canal bridges! ?
BEngo Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 So who gets the Bill to repair it? Won't be the Old Bill, cos they didn't hit the bridge. Won't be the scallies, because they have taken to their toes, and any way they weren't insured. Might be the owner of the car that actually damaged the bridge, but since they were stationary and apparently not at fault that seems a bit hard. They are already carless through no fault of theirs. Wonder if the Motor Industry Insurance fall-back scheme will cough? CRT will no doubt have to ante up first and after that some Lawyers will no doubt have a Bill of their own ( only it will be called a fee account and bigger than an ordinary Bill)! N
Jerra Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 13 minutes ago, BEngo said: So who gets the Bill to repair it? Won't be the Old Bill, cos they didn't hit the bridge. Won't be the scallies, because they have taken to their toes, and any way they weren't insured. Might be the owner of the car that actually damaged the bridge, but since they were stationary and apparently not at fault that seems a bit hard. They are already carless through no fault of theirs. Wonder if the Motor Industry Insurance fall-back scheme will cough? CRT will no doubt have to ante up first and after that some Lawyers will no doubt have a Bill of their own ( only it will be called a fee account and bigger than an ordinary Bill)! N According to the article the council want to replace the bridge and had submitted plans. Perhaps they will get their way.
Taslim Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 57 minutes ago, Jerra said: According to the article the council want to replace the bridge and had submitted plans. Perhaps they will get their way. Judging by the 'photo the bridge was overdue for repairs/maintenance anyway. Could be a good time for a new bridge & the Council seems keen.
ditchcrawler Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 New bridge, what about the heritage
David Mack Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 From the linked article: "Updated plans for a new £3 million structure directly next to the existing bridge were officially submitted in August and are due to be considered by the council's planning committee in February."
pearley Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 There have been discussions about replacing the bridge for 3 or 4 years at least. The plan was to build a new wider bridge on the Brownhills side of the existing one.
Tim Lewis Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 48 minutes ago, pearley said: There have been discussions about replacing the bridge for 3 or 4 years at least. The plan was to build a new wider bridge on the Brownhills side of the existing one. https://www.expressandstar.com/news/local-hubs/walsall/pelsall/2019/08/21/3-million-pelsall-canal-bridge-plan-hit-by-delay/
BWM Posted January 17, 2020 Report Posted January 17, 2020 6 hours ago, Dr Bob said: The moral of this story is don't park by canal bridges! ? The bridge near the Shovel in Cowley had some spectacular parked car pile ups, until they painted double yellow lines either side of it. Drunk drive dominoes, four cars and a motorcycle was the biggest hit.
Cheshire cat Posted January 19, 2020 Report Posted January 19, 2020 On 17/01/2020 at 11:41, BEngo said: So who gets the Bill to repair it? Won't be the Old Bill, cos they didn't hit the bridge. Won't be the scallies, because they have taken to their toes, and any way they weren't insured. Might be the owner of the car that actually damaged the bridge, but since they were stationary and apparently not at fault that seems a bit hard. They are already carless through no fault of theirs. Wonder if the Motor Industry Insurance fall-back scheme will cough? CRT will no doubt have to ante up first and after that some Lawyers will no doubt have a Bill of their own ( only it will be called a fee account and bigger than an ordinary Bill)! N CRT claim off the stationary cars insurance who in turn will claim off the stolen car owner's insurance.
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now