Jump to content

Water Tank Meter


Jen-in-Wellies

Featured Posts

1 hour ago, ivan&alice said:

I love this project! A possible addition could be a sensor measuring how much was going in as well, because I'd like to know sometimes how far off from full I am while filling.

Has anyone experimented with other approaches to measuring the water that is actually in the tank, like a float or a pressure based system? I suppose this is going to be inaccurate based on the trim, but perhaps it could be combined with the Hall effect sensor to get an accurate reading?

Yes, I've experimented extensively. I have an MCS gauge and I've tried reading it when full, when filling, during use and when empty. My conclusions were: "that works then, I'll stick with it". More complicated solutions are available (but are no more effective).  ;)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ivan&alice said:

I love this project! A possible addition could be a sensor measuring how much was going in as well, because I'd like to know sometimes how far off from full I am while filling.

Has anyone experimented with other approaches to measuring the water that is actually in the tank, like a float or a pressure based system? I suppose this is going to be inaccurate based on the trim, but perhaps it could be combined with the Hall effect sensor to get an accurate reading?

Yes, I fitted a simple gauge 20 years ago (after telling SWMBO that yes I was sure there was enough water for her to have a shower, but no there wasn't enough to let her rinse the soap off) and it works impeccably. A length of 3 core flex, with one of its wires cut a few inches short, pokes into the tank via a small (resealed) hole in the filler pipe so that it goes 3/4 of the way down. Then a simple circuit consisting of just one CMOS logic chip senses which bits of wire are covered by the water and drives a bi-colour LED. Green means more than half full, Yellow means a quarter to a half, Red means less than a quarter. Total cost, less than 50p

  • Greenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lordy, lordy has 'everyone' forgottin the long standing KISS pirinciple - intertwined with 'if it ain't broken - don't fix it'.

 

A simple solution - fit a sight gauge near the tank - with a float if needs be. Every so often as I go out of the front door - I look down at the pipe that contains the float and that gives me a measure of how much water we've got.

No faffing around with arduinos and slightly remote telemetry - just observe....

 

There are better things to do with your money....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Keeping Up said:

For anyone that may be interested, here is the circuit diagram of my meter:

 

 

2048802586_KeepingUpgauge.jpg.fdffdb05b03f04380ee87152a22da577.jpg

You don’t name the chip... do I have to go look at pin-out diagrams now...? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TheBiscuits said:

CMOS 4001 at a guess.

Then I’m really not getting the logic of how it works.
 

Oh yeah, I see... what a clever bit of design :)

Edited by WotEver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Missed this up to now. Great project, I like it (even though I don’t really like Arduinos, but that is just my prejudice!). Yes I think you could use a hardware timer to generate the time delays and have the processor sleeping in the mean time, being woken up by the timer overflow interrupt. As I implied I’m not up on Arduinos but you would have to check that there is a sleep mode that stops the CPU whilst the system clock continues to run to clock the hardware timer. Another option would be to simply clock the device very slowly so that even though it runs all the time, the power consumption is minimal (power consumption closely related to clock speed).

 

Its funny how some people can’t resist dissing any inventiveness and exposing their luddite nature. I’m sure if someone created a thread about how they’d installed an led light, someone would come along and say “what is wrong with a candle? I prefer the KISS approach”.
 

Why don’t they just say “I have spent my life fearing technology instead of learning about it, or maybe I’m just too thick to understand it”?

 

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nicknorman said:

Missed this up to now. Great project, I like it (even though I don’t really like Arduinos, but that is just my prejudice!). Yes I think you could use a hardware timer to generate the time delays and have the processor sleeping in the mean time, being woken up by the timer overflow interrupt. As I implied I’m not up on Arduinos but you would have to check that there is a sleep mode that stops the CPU whilst the system clock continues to run to clock the hardware timer. Another option would be to simply clock the device very slowly so that even though it runs all the time, the power consumption is minimal (power consumption closely related to clock speed).

 

Its funny how some people can’t resist dissing any inventiveness and exposing their luddite nature. I’m sure if someone created a thread about how they’d installed an led light, someone would come along and say “what is wrong with a candle? I prefer the KISS approach”.
 

Why don’t they just say “I have spent my life fearing technology instead of learning about it, or maybe I’m just too thick to understand it”?

 

Because when a small ball float in a tube fails its obvious - its either submerged of left high and dry. When something electronic fails what has failed is far from obvious. KIS. That is why mechanics today need computers to confuse them when fault finding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tony Brooks said:

Because when a small ball float in a tube fails its obvious - its either submerged of left high and dry. When something electronic fails what has failed is far from obvious. KIS. That is why mechanics today need computers to confuse them when fault finding.

Yes you are right, when a sight tube with a ball in it fails, it is obvious because the entire contents of the tank ends up in the cabin. Although I’m struggling to see how that is a good thing?

 

When something electronic fails (which it is unlikely to do if designed properly) it is obvious if you understand how it works.

 

People moan about the complexity of eg modern cars, but they forget the “good old days” of tinkering with contact breakers, damp ht leads, arcing distributor caps, trying to synchronise twin carbs, adjusting the idle mixture and speed etc etc. These days, cars just work, they don’t need to be faffed about with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WotEver said:

 

Oh yeah, I see... what a clever bit of design :)

Thanks. Incidentally the off-switch is necessary for when you aren't using it, not so much because of wasting a few mA of current but mainly because otherwise after 2 years the exposed copper ends of two of the sensor wires will have electrolysed themselves away on to the third.

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, TheBiscuits said:

CMOS 4001 at a guess.

Work of the devil, all those high impedance inputs. I inherited some home made instrumentation where the various enable lines were left floating. It worked fine most of the time but had weather dependent faults.

 

................Dave

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, AndrewIC said:

I like it. You could simplify it still further with an ATtiny and a few passives, but you’d need a programmer to load the code (an Arduino will do). 

The mk 3 version is sort of going this way. Pro Mini, rather than ATiny. These sorts of smaller boards without a lot of the extra circuitry give the best options for making serious cuts in power consumption.

1 hour ago, Rob-M said:

What do you do if you get fed up waiting at a really slow water point and stop before the tank is completely full...?

 

I estimate the level in our tank by how low the bows sit.

Then it won't work properly till you fill it up full again.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.