Jump to content

Bargees Complain about Schooling Problems


Alan de Enfield

Featured Posts

 

A 100% increase on 'zero' is still 'zero'.

Eh? I think you are confusing the mathematical principle of 100% of zero is still zero and the premise of whatever they pay is 100% more than they were paying before, but thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh? I think you are confusing the mathematical principle of 100% of zero is still zero and the premise of whatever they pay is 100% more than they were paying before, but thanks.

Nice try. But you yourself defined the original as zero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Because CaRT would have to persuade the local Council to grant Planning Permission to allow it . . .

 

CaRT would not have to persuade the local Councils to grant planning permission for simply establishing offside moorings. Use of the banks for mooring is an integral part of the canal’s function, so there is no ‘change of use’ involved.

 

Only if there was serious infrastructure would there be building work possibly requiring consent, as of course would residential or commercial use of the moorings. But mooring itself requires no planning permission; BW fought this point before the Planning Inspectorate back in 2006/7, and won the case.

 

http://kanda.boatingcommunity.org.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/http___www.pcs_.planningportal.gov_.uk_pcsportal_fscdav_READONLY_OBJCOO.2036.300.2.6228648NAME_Decision.pdf

 

Of course, they only fought the issue on that occasion because it was their tenant that was being targeted with enforcement; other times they have ignored this precedent and argued before the Inspectorate that moorings should not be allowed, when they themselves didn’t want particular people to moor against property not in their ownership. But the precedent remains.

 

  • Greenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My issue is this

1. your sat there paying say 3k a year to moor on a towpath or even opposite side with access so you can get your children to school and go to work then when you can you go boating for a few weeks come back carry on (no problem)

2. Your sat ther for 14 days move off and tie up leave the boat go to work travel or what ever at your own expense. Come back or move 14 days later and slowly travel round the system. (No problem)

3. No fam 3 turn up stat ranting that they cant afford to buy a mooring so are forced to have a cc licance make such a complaint and start throwing laws and rights at crt so they grant them a mooring just behind fam 1 for free or for a very low fee say 500 a year.

 

Now the solution is solved is it not? Except how angry would you be. Unfortunately its the same as what happens with houses you pay full wack and the person 2 doors down coz they know the system and cant be assed to get a job get the house for next to nothing drives me mad! (I know there can be propper circumstances for houses as well.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah oh hang on, some have never lived in houses, you do know that don't you?

How common is that nowadays? There must be very, very few people who have lived their entire lives on boats. Is there anyone on this forum who has done so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The obvious solution is for CaRT to provide a taxi from anywhere on the system to convey anyones child to the school of the boaters choice.

Why should they? Surely you are not suggesting that boaters are so feeble-minded and disorganised that they can't even order a taxi without help from CART?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why should they? Surely you are not suggesting that boaters are so feeble-minded and disorganised that they can't even order a taxi without help from CART?

 

Athy, I do worry about you sometimes. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How common is that nowadays? There must be very, very few people who have lived their entire lives on boats. Is there anyone on this forum who has done so?

 

Boats are not the only alternatives to houses. I think the key word is 'traveller' in the name of the campaigning group

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Are you suggesting that you should be just allowed to 'dump' your boat for 5 weeks because you are too busy to move it ?

 

 

No, I'm not, and neither is anyone else. I was making the point that in fact you can't do this as the law requires you to move every 14 days, so, as I had a lot on I put it in a marina. ............

 

Maybe badly written, or my bad interpretation, but my 'take' from your post :-

 

"One of the results of this bit of the policy being effectively enforced is that Lutine is in Fenny Compton Marina for 5 weeks because I don't have time to move her at all"

 

is that the reason that Lutine was in a marina was because of the enforcement of the law, and by implication, if there was no effective enforcement she would not be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Boats are not the only alternatives to houses. I think the key word is 'traveller' in the name of the campaigning group

 

Richard

If it wasn't for the fact that they appear to want to do anything other than travel I would be inclined to agree. Or on second thoughts I do agree but they don't seem to have noticed they are called travellers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Athy, I do worry about you sometimes. wink.png

Your concern is most touching.

But what are you on about? With the current widespread rise in mobile phone ownership, boaters should be able to ring for a taxi even if they're in remote spots, so long as there's a road nearby. It could be an expensive way of conveying children to and from school - though I do remember some pupils arriving by cab at the various schools in which I taught, so there are some people who do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boats are not the only alternatives to houses. I think the key word is 'traveller' in the name of the campaigning group

 

Richard

Perhaps they are interpreting what "traveller" means in the same way they interpret the legislation applicable to CRT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps they are interpreting what "traveller" means in the same way they interpret the legislation applicable to CRT?

 

Now, to me, 'Traveller' has a very specific meaning. Probably due to my age

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now, to me, 'Traveller' has a very specific meaning. Probably due to my age

 

Richard

Same with me, and also with the wording of the legislation.

 

Having spent a large part of my career reading and applying contracts and writing specifications I have a very clear understanding of the meaning of most words!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must have a different definition of baby boomer to the one I grew up with! I thought I was a baby boomer and I am well past middle age.

I'm a 1955 model, don't know if that makes me a baby boomer or not.

 

But what I do know is that the older I get the more I realise how lucky I have been in life and I'm certainly not going to vent my spleen on those in a less fortunate position than me.

  • Greenie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Both of the above, but also in its purest seense, a person who moves from place to place ☺

 

Having spent a large part of your career reading and applying contracts and writing specifications, you'll notice my use of a capital T in Traveller

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.