Exactly in line with the RCD/RCR statement, except, that evidence of equivalence has to be submitted to the RCD/RCR and included in the technical manual.
Other ways to comply with the essential requirements.
The application of harmonised standards is not the only
means to demonstrate the conformity of a product.
However, only harmonised standards, after publication of
references in the Official Journal of the EU (OJEU), may
provide an automatic presumption of conformity against
essential requirements covered by such standards.
With the exception of the Directive’s mandatory reference
to some harmonised standards (see Point 3), the
manufacturer can choose whether or not to apply and refer
to harmonised standards. However, if the manufacturer
chooses not to follow the harmonised standards, he has
the obligation to demonstrate that his products are in
conformity with essential requirements by the use of other
means that provide for at least an equivalent level of safety
or protection.
These can be technical specifications such as national
standards, European or international standards which are
not harmonised, i.e. not published in the OJEU, rules of
notified bodies or the manufacturer’s own specifications.
In these cases the manufacturer does not benefit from the
presumption of conformity, but has to demonstrate the
conformity himself. This implies that he demonstrates, in the
technical documentation of a relevant product, in a more
detailed manner how the technical specifications he uses
provide conformity with the essential requirements.
Manufacturers are advised to stay informed about the
developments in international standardisation. Even if
the manufacturer has not used harmonised standards, a
change in the relevant harmonised standard could mean
a change in the state of the art that implies that his product
may not be compliant.