Jump to content

Battery charging


Pipenslippers

Featured Posts

What battery type are you using on gibbo's device? 1 or 4? I have tried both with calcium batts but not really noticed a difference between the two.

At the moment, 6, which the manual says is for calcium/calcium types (with a free Gibbo sneer included ;)). Not having cruised with them yet, they haven't had any charge/discharge cycles so can't assess the accuracy. I plan to compare 6 against 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the moment, 6, which the manual says is for calcium/calcium types (with a free Gibbo sneer included ;)). Not having cruised with them yet, they haven't had any charge/discharge cycles so can't assess the accuracy. I plan to compare 6 against 1.

Just checked mine its on 6 must have been between 6 & 4 that I was trying and I eneded up on 6.

Let us know how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised to see the resting voltage at 13.2, not the 12.8 I was expecting, but apparently that's what you get from calciums. Means those neat tables showing resting voltage against SOC need modifying for the increasingly common calcium cells.

This has always been the case when I've fitted new batteries. After a week or two of use they will settle to about 12.8 volts (resting) when charged for the remainder of their useful life. When the resting voltage starts to fall below 12.8 volts is the time to start looking for the best price for a new set.

Steve (Eeyore)

Edited by Eeyore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has always been the case when I've fitted new batteries. After a week or two of use they will settle to about 12.8 volts (resting) when charged for the remainder of their useful life. When the resting voltage starts to fall below 12.8 volts is the time to start looking for the best price for a new set.

Steve (Eeyore)

Well, well, thanks for that, never noticed it before. Mind you, I think this is the first time I've been off the boat like this immediately after fitting new batts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just checked mine its on 6 must have been between 6 & 4 that I was trying and I eneded up on 6.

Let us know how it goes.

We've now been cruising for a week and comparing the SmartGauge SoC with resting voltage indicates that battery type 6 is reasonably accurate. For example, the SG said 88% first thing this morning and the voltage was 12.6.

 

OTOH, the SG is very optimistic when charging, showing 100% SoC when the batteries are still pulling 12A at 14.4V into a 452Ah bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've now been cruising for a week and comparing the SmartGauge SoC with resting voltage indicates that battery type 6 is reasonably accurate. For example, the SG said 88% first thing this morning and the voltage was 12.6.

OTOH, the SG is very optimistic when charging, showing 100% SoC when the batteries are still pulling 12A at 14.4V into a 452Ah bank.

The manual tells you it's not accurate when charging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a similar price to the BMV 700 but my gut feeling is that the latter is a slightly better product, but it would be interesting to see a side-by-side comparison.

 

"Slightly" is probably the operative word, and buying either almost certainly wont end in dissappointment. Although I agree it could be an interesting article for a Canal magazine, or Practical Boatowner, or similar.

 

Apart from SOC %age, I have found the NASA does everything I expected and wanted, and I havent wished it did anything differently or better.

 

I believe the BMV has the same issue with SOC %age, and I would expect BMV users would feel the same about it as I do about the NASA.

 

I solved the SOC issue by buying a Smartguage - being aware that they say that it can be 10% out either way when charging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Slightly" is probably the operative word, and buying either almost certainly wont end in dissappointment. Although I agree it could be an interesting article for a Canal magazine, or Practical Boatowner, or similar.

 

Apart from SOC %age, I have found the NASA does everything I expected and wanted, and I havent wished it did anything differently or better.

 

I believe the BMV has the same issue with SOC %age, and I would expect BMV users would feel the same about it as I do about the NASA.

 

I solved the SOC issue by buying a Smartguage - being aware that they say that it can be 10% out either way when charging.

Couple of points in BMVs favour I think:

 

Wiring up BMV is much easier due to just having to plug in the CAT5 cable, whereas the NASA seems to have quite a few wires to join together and the installation manual shows a chocolate block. Yuk!

 

The NASA tries to be clever using a Smartgauge type voltage algorithm in conjunction with AH accounting. However by all accounts (including their own) it doesn't really work, rendering the SoC reading completely useless. There are no user settings to tweak other than battery capacity. Whereas the BMV is a conventional AH counter which if carefully set up with the right capacity, tail current, CEF etc will give a fairly reliable SoC mid-charge especially if it is regularly synchronised by taking the batteries to 100%.

 

However if the aim is just to use it as an ammeter and AH-used meter, eg in conjunction with a Smartgauge for discharging SoC perhaps these deficiencies don't matter and it is a bit cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NASA has a bigger display than the BMV, which I like but obv would not suit everyone.

 

 

I have to say, the tiny interface on the BMV put me off big time! Then I read it also interfaces with an app on one's Smartphone so that's now a big PLUS for the BMV. Bluetooth only though, which is flakey in my experience over the length of a narrowboat.

 

Does the BM2 also communicate with a Smartphone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm quite tempted by this

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/171906112639

For voltage and current

Depends of course how big the CT hole is.

 

Hmmm current transformers don't work on DC so if it is in fact a hall effect sensor then it is likely to be fairly inaccurate including a temperature dependant zero offset. I note that it mentions a resolution (1A) but not an accuracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say, the tiny interface on the BMV put me off big time! Then I read it also interfaces with an app on one's Smartphone so that's now a big PLUS for the BMV. Bluetooth only though, which is flakey in my experience over the length of a narrowboat.

 

Does the BM2 also communicate with a Smartphone?

Not that I know of, I'm afraid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hmmm current transformers don't work on DC so if it is in fact a hall effect sensor then it is likely to be fairly inaccurate including a temperature dependant zero offset. I note that it mentions a resolution (1A) but not an accuracy.

I realise that CT are for AC only but I assumed it works on the same principle as the DC current clamp meter that we all love so much.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realise that CT are for AC only but I assumed it works on the same principle as the DC current clamp meter that we all love so much.

 

Hall effect. Yes but they too aren't very accurate for low currents. If you are using something to count AH on a boat an it has a zero offset of 1A, it is not much use!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

If your engine is well maintained its cheap enough. Honda petrol generators are quiet but more expensive than your engine. Solar panels of about 250w with an MTTP controller will set you back 500 to 600 quid but do a great job if there is enough sun striking the panel at a perpendicular angle. Wind generators are pricey and cause vibration, with difficulty in mounting securely so you can take them up or down easily. In other words it's swings and roundabouts. Most people run their engine for an hour or two a day to get jot water and electric. A good engine should not use more than 2 litres of red diesel in 2 hours, which would currently cost £1.80.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your engine is well maintained its cheap enough. Honda petrol generators are quiet but more expensive than your engine. Solar panels of about 250w with an MTTP controller will set you back 500 to 600 quid but do a great job if there is enough sun striking the panel at a perpendicular angle. Wind generators are pricey and cause vibration, with difficulty in mounting securely so you can take them up or down easily. In other words it's swings and roundabouts. Most people run their engine for an hour or two a day to get jot water and electric. A good engine should not use more than 2 litres of red diesel in 2 hours, which would currently cost £1.80.

Your solar prices seem a bit high, unless you are including labour costs to fit the kit.

You can get from Bimble Solar a new 260W panel for about £170 and another £150 for a controller and display.

Allow another £50 for installation bits and bobs - assuming you self install using simple brackets. Total cost is less than £400.

If you use a smaller controller and a used panel it is a fair bit cheaper.

 

I got my set-up from Bimble (a couple of used panels, total 440W) and this time of year my electric usage is less then the solar output, so I can stop for as long as I wish without having to run the engine.

Edited by Chewbacka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.