Jump to content

How NOT to moor up at the local pub


bigste

Featured Posts

Is it legal for a PPL(H) to fly with any alcohol at all in their veins?

It may be illegal but somebody that tries to land a helicopter twice practically on top of a pub ,miles from anywhere was probably pissed to start with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did think it would be an interesting one when I first posted it. My own view is that he has just got to be pissed to try that. Apparently after the first attempt and go round someone cleared the table for him. Crazy but true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did think it would be an interesting one when I first posted it. My own view is that he has just got to be pissed to try that. Apparently after the first attempt and go round someone cleared the table for him. Crazy but true.

Not necessarily - plenty of sober folk do stupid things like that - they just got their licence and then think they can do anything, whilst being totally oblivious to the hazards of confined areas, and/or have more money than sense. You see the equivalent people in the boating world although usually the outcome is less catastrophic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not necessarily - plenty of sober folk do stupid things like that - they just got their licence and then think they can do anything, whilst being totally oblivious to the hazards of confined areas, and/or have more money than sense. You see the equivalent people in the boating world although usually the outcome is less catastrophic.

What are the likely penalties for pulling an idiotic stunt like that, presumably the pilot loses his licence for at least a long period of time can they get it back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are the likely penalties for pulling an idiotic stunt like that, presumably the pilot loses his licence for at least a long period of time can they get it back?

Well first you have to decide what you want to prosecute him for. It is not illegal to land in the grounds of a pub (with the owner's permission) per se. So I guess it's some fairly generic dangerous flying charge and the likely outcome would be a fine and ban, but the severity would obviously be up to the court's judgement of how serious the offence was. And of course he will be prosecuted in Ireland presumably, not the UK.

 

Its a failure of judgement. You could perhaps say it is not unlike bumping your car into another's car in the pub carpark. If you were being careful but nevertheless misjudged it, you wouldn't expect to be prosecuted. However if you screamed into the pub wheels spinning, handbrake-turned it into a space but missed, you would likely be prosecuted (if there was adequate evidence like CCTV).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well first you have to decide what you want to prosecute him for. It is not illegal to land in the grounds of a pub (with the owner's permission) per se. So I guess it's some fairly generic dangerous flying charge and the likely outcome would be a fine and ban, but the severity would obviously be up to the court's judgement of how serious the offence was. And of course he will be prosecuted in Ireland presumably, not the UK.

 

Its a failure of judgement. You could perhaps say it is not unlike bumping your car into another's car in the pub carpark. If you were being careful but nevertheless misjudged it, you wouldn't expect to be prosecuted. However if you screamed into the pub wheels spinning, handbrake-turned it into a space but missed, you would likely be prosecuted (if there was adequate evidence like CCTV).

 

Whilst the landing was clearly not an appropriate one to attempt, it remains to be seen whether the outcome is as a result of getting the landing wrong, or whether a mechanical failure happened at the wrong time.

 

If the latter, then one would imagine that the consequences are not as a result of crashing, but as a result of executing a dangerous landing.

 

In other words, had he landed OK, and the footage emerged, he would still have been in the mire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst the landing was clearly not an appropriate one to attempt, it remains to be seen whether the outcome is as a result of getting the landing wrong, or whether a mechanical failure happened at the wrong time.

 

If the latter, then one would imagine that the consequences are not as a result of crashing, but as a result of executing a dangerous landing.

 

In other words, had he landed OK, and the footage emerged, he would still have been in the mire.

I suspect the mechanical failure you are seeing is the result of something hitting the fenestron fan blades, whether it be a fixed obstacle or some debris (chunk of wood etc) blown up by the main rotors in proximity to the building. However we can't be sure either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good pilot takes the possibility of a mechanical failure into account and flies so that he can land safety in the event of one. Thats not to say one can anticipate all eventualities but as the well known saying goes. "There are old pilots and there are bold pilots but there are no old bold pilots".

 

Top Cat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the pilot was pished, what is the likelihood of this being spotted and proved?

 

Are the police entitled to breathalise a pilot after an air crash? Is anyone likely to breathlise them in a timely enough manner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the pilot was pished,

 

Why do we think he was? After all he was going to the pub, not away

 

Are you suggesting you need to be drunk to do silly things? I can provide plenty of evidence to the contrary. For instance, I can show you some scars

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good pilot takes the possibility of a mechanical failure into account and flies so that he can land safety in the event of one. Thats not to say one can anticipate all eventualities but as the well known saying goes. "There are old pilots and there are bold pilots but there are no old bold pilots".

Top Cat

It's pretty hard to cope with a tail rotor failure in the hover though, that's always likely to be a crash of some sort. And it could be said that the guy in question did land safely since no-one was seriously injured!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good pilot takes the possibility of a mechanical failure into account and flies so that he can land safety in the event of one.

 

This was brought home to me reading the books by Richard Bach* about owning and flying old biplanes. It would seem most of his flight was dedicated to working out which field he could land in when the engine cut out

 

Richard

 

*Jonathan Livingston Seagull

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm rather going off my idea of buying a drone ....

 

I wonder if you know what the conversations are amongst people watching flying photographic drones? From experience, they usually include nets, arrows and shotguns

 

Richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty hard to cope with a tail rotor failure in the hover though, that's always likely to be a crash of some sort. And it could be said that the guy in question did land safely since no-one was seriously injured!

Thats why you dont try and put a heli down in a confined space like that.

 

T C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats why you dont try and put a heli down in a confined space like that.

 

T C

But you do. Landing in confined areas is part of basic helicopter training. Even if you are not in a confined area, if you have a tail rotor failure* in the hover you will almost certainly crash, having rolled over and smashed the rotors to bits. The aircraft will be a right-off.

 

*Tail rotor drive failure, or the failure of the tail rotor itself, not a tail rotor control failure which is usually much more benign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty hard to cope with a tail rotor failure in the hover though, that's always likely to be a crash of some sort. And it could be said that the guy in question did land arrive safely since no-one was seriously injured!

 

Nothing bent : landing

 

Airyplane bent : arrival

 

Pilot not able to walk away : crash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pilot was arrested in the airport trying to leave the country.I reckon that sums it up.And im fairly sure that it was a public towpath and not a pub garden.The pub backs on to the canal.

and he was later released

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and he was later released

The Bail Act virtually guarantees a persons release, even for murder, unless a court can be satisfied that the offender will abscond, commit further offences, interfere with witnesses etc. Onus on the prosecutor to prove that may happen.

 

George ex nb Alton retired

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.