mayalld

I'm afraid that I have to disagree. This was not an unavoidable accident, and the narrative of "they were all pushing each other in, and there was nothing untoward, lads will be lads" is quite simply wrong. They were all engaged in what was pretty stupid behaviour, and this resulted in a death. The guy who died was stupid. Those pushing their friends in were stupid, the skipper was stupid. He has placed himself in charge of a vehicle, and has not exercised proper attention to the responsibilities that this brings. My view is that this is gross negligence manslaughter.

OK, so you have asked your brother for help. You seem to feel that as what you are asking is easy for him and hard for you, he is under some kind of obligation to help you, and you are complaining that he is going to come to help you at a time that is inconvenient to you, because it will interrupt what YOU want to do. That does seem to be a somewhat entitled approach. If you want your brother to help you, then perhaps you should have the good grace to accept the help he offers at HIS convenience, rather than expecting him to work around what you want?

Yes, it does seem to be slightly less than regular!

The app requests the log around every 2 hours, and what it gets are the keys of anybody whose app has them as being positive (whether because they say they have symptoms or because they have tested positive) What your app does is check if it has seen any of those keys. If it has, then the API will flag up a banner to say that your app will evaluate the contact. That means that the app will look at how long and how close the contact is, before deciding if you need to isolate. I have had one flag of a contact, but the app didn't evaluate it as a cl

Not so. The headline figure is the number reported today, but the data series you can download is by sample date.

With my pedantic head on; PCCs are an excepted charity, rather than an exempt charity. Exempt charities are outwith the purview of the charity commission. Excepted Charities are not registered, but are regulated by the charity commission

It is indeed very sad indeed to hear of Nigel's death. I wasn't even aware that he was unwell. I am glad that we both stuck at it from initial butting of heads on issues upon which we would never agree to the point where we still disagreed about most things, but we had moved past the fact that we disagreed. Our arguing about the detail turned heat into light, and although we continued to disagree, we were both intellectually challenged by the fine detail of the argument. In some cases, we each came to understand that the world wasn't as we would want it, and

My understanding is that this is an argument advanced by the baton twirlers. The CRT legal position, namely that a Roving Mooring Permit created no additional category, because it was a permit to keep the boat in a place (in fact several places) is perfectly good. The RMP foundered on an entirely unconnected legal point, namely that it was only available to boaters who had previously been CCers