Jump to content

Grand Union Canal water transfer scheme latest


Featured Posts

4 minutes ago, LadyG said:

Birmingham draws its water from reservoirs in Wales rather than the Lickey Hills ..... That's the reason they have a "surplus"

But the question was where is it going NOW. Back to Wales, to the North Sea or some other location? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oboat said:

But the question was where is it going NOW. Back to Wales, to the North Sea or some other location? 

I'd imagine it goes in to the canals and  rivers via the sewage treatment works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toggle searchToggle navigationMENU

Making life better by water

 

Grand Union Canal - Braunston to Cowley Lock Uxbridge

DetailFrom Date: 26/07/2024 10:00

To Date: 31/011/2024 10:00 inclusive

Type: Water Movememt

Is the towpath closed? No, but might be flooded in some locations.

cation

Closest waterway: Grand Union Canal

Starts at: Bridge 1 (Roadbridge)Braunston

Ends at: London Paddington Pound

NAVIGATION IS SUSPENDED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE

Due to the extreme water shortage situation in the London urban area and South East in general, the use of the Grand Union Canal is reverting to Oasis status and navigation is suspended for the forseeable future. Locks will be used as overflow wiers in the downhill sections and mooring here is not advised due to possible overtopping of the UK.Gov WaterSupplyChannel. Any boats moored up on the channel must make sure they have sufficient lines and anchors to withstand 3mph waterflow for several weeks, if not longer. Navigation will be not possible, even dangerous, and locks will be secured against passage.

Cosgrove area - This area may be severely impacted by the imposition of the UK.Gov Water SupplyChannel, and any boats moored below Cosgrove Lock must be removed to a safe location immediately. Not only will the flow negatively impact the structure surrounding Cosgrove Lock, but due to engineering oversight in the early 1800s, the Great Ouse Aqueduct may be negatively compromised, resulting in a local drainage of the channel.

THE GLOBE, Linslade

Evacuation of the local area is recommended, dont book a table and expect to find it in the pub, our pumps cant hope to cope with all the water you know.

We are sorry for any impact to your booked holidays or cruising plans but obviously, our water supply route is far more lucrative than a few cancelled hire boats. So long as you are floating, you are honoured to pay our annual licence fee, if not, contact your insurance company.

Thanks

Damien, your local friendly CRT waterways news and issues chap.

  • Greenie 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, matty40s said:
Toggle searchToggle navigationMENU

Making life better by water

 

Grand Union Canal - Braunston to Cowley Lock Uxbridge

DetailFrom Date: 26/07/2024 10:00

To Date: 31/011/2024 10:00 inclusive

Type: Water Movememt

Is the towpath closed? No, but might be flooded in some locations.

cation

Closest waterway: Grand Union Canal

Starts at: Bridge 1 (Roadbridge)Braunston

Ends at: London Paddington Pound

NAVIGATION IS SUSPENDED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE

Due to the extreme water shortage situation in the London urban area and South East in general, the use of the Grand Union Canal is reverting to Oasis status and navigation is suspended for the forseeable future. Locks will be used as overflow wiers in the downhill sections and mooring here is not advised due to possible overtopping of the UK.Gov WaterSupplyChannel. Any boats moored up on the channel must make sure they have sufficient lines and anchors to withstand 3mph waterflow for several weeks, if not longer. Navigation will be not possible, even dangerous, and locks will be secured against passage.

Cosgrove area - This area may be severely impacted by the imposition of the UK.Gov Water SupplyChannel, and any boats moored below Cosgrove Lock must be removed to a safe location immediately. Not only will the flow negatively impact the structure surrounding Cosgrove Lock, but due to engineering oversight in the early 1800s, the Great Ouse Aqueduct may be negatively compromised, resulting in a local drainage of the channel.

THE GLOBE, Linslade

Evacuation of the local area is recommended, dont book a table and expect to find it in the pub, our pumps cant hope to cope with all the water you know.

We are sorry for any impact to your booked holidays or cruising plans but obviously, our water supply route is far more lucrative than a few cancelled hire boats. So long as you are floating, you are honoured to pay our annual licence fee, if not, contact your insurance company.

Thanks

Damien, your local friendly CRT waterways news and issues chap.

It doesn't seem likely there's so much spare water that a 3mph flow would be plausible. Our in-house clever bods have already calculated a measly 0.5mph flow. It's also still possible to use locks while they're overflowing, unless it's a serious torrent...

 

While this is an interesting fiction, I think it is likely to remain fictional ;) 

Edited by Ewan123
  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/06/2023 at 12:57, dixi188 said:

 My view of consultants is that they make the process as complicated as possible and gold plate any projects that go ahead because they are on a percentage of the final cost.

Look at HS2.

 

And they don't always get it right. An example being HS2's original plan for the line to cross the T&M in 3 places between Fradley Junction and Handsacre, until a bloke from IWA Lichfield branch worked out a new route that would only cross the canal once, and would save HS2 £55 million. They obviously changed their plans and adopted his.

 

I wonder how many other HS2 locations elsewhere are costing more than they should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Grassman said:

 

And they don't always get it right. An example being HS2's original plan for the line to cross the T&M in 3 places between Fradley Junction and Handsacre, until a bloke from IWA Lichfield branch worked out a new route that would only cross the canal once, and would save HS2 £55 million. They obviously changed their plans and adopted his.

 

I wonder how many other HS2 locations elsewhere are costing more than they should be.

 

If they were asked "plan the quickest and easiest route from A to B and tell us what it would cost" then that's exactly what they'll do, they don't have any incentive to save HS2 money.

 

If they'd been told "find the cheapest way to get HS2 from A to B" then the answer would have been different -- but HS2 are more concerned with speed because that's their USP, cost is SEP (Somebody Else's Problem).

 

In my experience consultants do what they're told (and no more), and any problems like this are usually due to poor instruction or definition of the task -- in other words, down to HS2.

 

So there may well be loads of similar cases all along the HS2 route, which will all in the end come down to HS2 incompetence. Quelle surprise... 😞

 

Edited by IanD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.