beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 Perhaps not difficult to guess we’re at Smethwick again, but what’s the story behind this pile of stone? 2 hours ago, Heartland said: YE GODS FALSE HISTORY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yesterday I was having a general skim through John Sargeant’s ‘Barging Round Britain’, a pleasant and easy read but seems to have quite a few errors, I would have to double check and check again before pointing to anything specific, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob-M Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 The dates I posted came from The Other Sixty Miles which I presumed was a reasonable reference for the BCN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Brightley Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Rob-M said: The dates I posted came from The Other Sixty Miles which I presumed was a reasonable reference for the BCN. Yes, generally it is. Richard Chester Browne did extensive research when he was putting that book together. However it was published in the 1980's so historians since (including Ray (Heartland)) may have found some more information in the intervening years. Edited February 20 by John Brightley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 I took my 1790 date from here https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1215249?section=official-list-entry which gave a ‘probable’ date, I thought it was much later, and had I guessed I’d have said 1820’s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 6 hours ago, beerbeerbeerbeerbeer said: . the path runs down beside a building that can be accessed from the Old and the New Main Lines, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Herne Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 52 minutes ago, beerbeerbeerbeerbeer said: the path runs down beside a building that can be accessed from the Old and the New Main Lines, Smethwick New Engine House. Passed this today: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 (edited) It is, but why the pile of stone? I’ve seen your cranes, can’t remember where, maybe somewhere close Black Patch Scrap Yard? ha, no the towpaths all wrong for there Edited February 20 by beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Herne Posted February 20 Report Share Posted February 20 37 minutes ago, beerbeerbeerbeerbeer said: It is, but why the pile of stone? Sorry, I wasn't paying enough attention... Don't know. Something to do with the original chimney? I know it was demolished and then rebuilt later slightly differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pluto Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 15 hours ago, beerbeerbeerbeerbeer said: I took my 1790 date from here https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1215249?section=official-list-entry which gave a ‘probable’ date, I thought it was much later, and had I guessed I’d have said 1820’s I wouldn't trust anything on the Historic England site until I had checked it. I have been trying for thirty years for the entry for Wigan warehouses to be rectified, and get nothing but stonewalling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartland Posted February 21 Author Report Share Posted February 21 Regarding the Smethwick Reduction the information comes from BCN records at Kew and was published in RCHS waterways History group sites and to a certain extent in Boundary Post. The BCN account books detail the payments for work done on reducing the summit as well as the dates when the work was done. With the pile of stones they are at Smethwick Engine House and I have come to think they were part of lock 6 which would have been opposite. It would be a useful project to examine them for mason marks. Although some think that lock six was a site in fresh air, my interpretation was that it was on the bank opposite at the 491ft od level. Widening of the old main line and the re-alignment needed for the Telford line construction resulted in the embankment being cut back. And this task is also shown in maps that were at BW Fazeley. Francis Hern has shown an image that includes what seems to be a factory of some type While people are trying to solve that question where was Sally ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
springy Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 Offside adjacent to Tipton Road Bridge on the Dudley tunnel branch, IIRC somewhere I have a similar photo of Sally in slightly better condition - sunk but cabin side intact. springy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Mack Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 1 hour ago, Heartland said: While people are trying to solve that question where was Sally ? I remember when Sally was afloat, owned by Don Payne and nicely painted up. I recall we used Sally on a couple of BCNS working parties in the mid 70s to take away tat pulled out of the canal. So it was with some surprise that a number of years later I came across Sally sunk and decaying on the offside of the Dudley No. 1 at Tipton, looking just like so many other sunken joeys that lined much of the BCN in the 70s. Almost all gone now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek R. Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 Late eighties: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartland Posted February 22 Author Report Share Posted February 22 That was a nice response. Did Sally decay into the canal I wonder OK another canal this time an aqueduct across a river whose name suggests that it quite a mild flow on it, however such is the case with rivers the flow can be quite strong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
springy Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 Re Sally - I don't think there's anything left there, the scrapyard was cleared some years ago and a care home now occupies the site, its possible that Sally was removed at that time. springy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 23 minutes ago, Heartland said: That was a nice response. Did Sally decay into the canal I wonder OK another canal this time an aqueduct across a river whose name suggests that it quite a mild flow on it, however such is the case with rivers the flow can be quite strong! I pass over this quite often and recognise it, As far as I know it’s the only aqueduct on this canal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob-M Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 Looks like Tame aqueduct, just before Fazeley aqueduct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 (edited) ..where’s Fazeley aquaduct? yep, I recognise it as the Aquaduct over the Tame. Edited February 22 by beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob-M Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 28 minutes ago, beerbeerbeerbeerbeer said: where’s Fazeley aquaduc 1 furlong further along according to canal plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Posted February 22 Report Share Posted February 22 Ha, yes, I see 😂 I suppose saying the Tame Aqueduct is the only Aquaduct on the Coventry Canal was quite a bold statement, I guess I should have said major aquaduct or Aquaduct with architectural significance or summat like that, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartland Posted February 23 Author Report Share Posted February 23 Yes well done Fazeley No 3 Aqueduct is not easily seen from the canal as it passes across the Tame Valley. Canal Plan has the following image. The brick arches are three in total. It is not unusual to find other arches at locations where there is a flood plain and with Fazeley it crosses a channel that eventually links up with the Tame 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 (edited) boating about today got me thinking: which other aquaducts or canals does the Tame pass under? I’ve come up with several places but so far only the name of one of the Aquaducts, looking at the map it’s interesting to see how the river Tame works its way around the Black Country and ends up joining the Trent out by Alrewas. Edited February 23 by beerbeerbeerbeerbeer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob-M Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 The aqueduct at Salford junction is over the River Tame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartland Posted February 23 Author Report Share Posted February 23 It is interesting the Tame actually has two branches in the Black Country and there were canal crossings. It flowed through Aston and then onto to join the Trent. There were a number of water mills along the course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Mack Posted February 23 Report Share Posted February 23 2 hours ago, Rob-M said: The aqueduct at Salford junction is over the River Tame. Aqueducts (plural). Both the Birmingham and Fazeley and Birmingham and Warwick Junction Canals have aqueducts over the Tame at Salford Bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now