jenlyn Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 This from the iwa site "IWA Calls For Action On 'Continuous Moorers'With the successful launch of Canal & River Trust, IWA has been reviewing its campaigning priorities. Whilst inclusion of the Environment Agency's navigations within CRT remains the top priority the issue of so called 'continuous moorers' is fast climbing IWA's priority action list.IWA is very supportive of those who wish to live aboard their boat, and indeed for those genuine continuous cruisers who travel the system in a progressive journey. However problems are caused when large numbers of live-aboard boaters without a home mooring wish, for whatever reason, to stay within a narrow geographic area. The problems had been exacerbated by years of enforcement neglect by British Waterways.A recent survey by BW indicated that over a six-month period around 1000 boats without a home mooring did not move more than 5km and a further 1000 boats not more than 10km.The situation in the London area and also at the west end of the Kennet & Avon canal is acute. IWA has now raised its concerns at the highest level within CRT. At a recent meeting with Sally Ash (CRT Head of Boating) these concerns were explored in detail together with her plans to tackle the situation. IWA is not alone in having concerns with other organisations, including the trade, demanding action" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wanted Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Hmmmm, I wonder what decisions are being made now that the powers that be have the boaters divided.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaggle Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Do they say if it is the IWA members who are forcing it to the top of the prioirty list or are they following others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenlyn Posted August 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Do they say if it is the IWA members who are forcing it to the top of the prioirty list or are they following others. Perhaps frauline Ash has requested them to make it an issue? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscan Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 I agree that this needs to come up the agenda more so than license evasion. However there needs to be a lot of thought by CRT as to how any changes are enforced and by whom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cotswoldsman Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 I find it hard to believe that CaRT actually monitored 2,000 boats. I don't see this as a major issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty40s Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 The concern for me is the fact that 5 of the CaRT trustee council members are also IWA members and were actively nominated and supported during the election campaign. I can not see them representing ALL boaters , rather that they will toe the party line and push the IWA focus through regardless. There are FAR more serious issues to boaters, infrastructure, repairs (or lack of) and maintenance (or lack of). I am on me moby, but will post a piccy later of the repairs to the flood sluices at Barrow. Plywood and blue string are the solution!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post fuzzyduck Posted August 28, 2012 Popular Post Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 (edited) This just in: a transcript from a conversation held deep within C&RT HQ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sally Ash (SA): Welcome Clive, welcome to my secret lair. Did you enjoy the tour? Clive Henderson (CH): Yes I did, and I'm ashamed to say I didn't know that C&RT had a secret lair under a volcano, somewhere in the far east. SA: Yes we do, we find it .... Convenient. Did you see the tank of sharks with laserbeams on their heads? (Sally strokes white Persian cat) CH: Yes, very interesting .... and a real pleasure to see them feeding, what do you feed them? SA: Lets just say the wishy washy liberal Simon Robbins won't be supporting those pesky Boater's Manifesto rabble again. :::Insane laughter::: CH: Ohhh, you are wonderful, a bit like myself SA: I Know ... Anyway, to business.. CH: No, you really are amazing, may I lick your thighs? SA: Not yet Clive, but if you do my bidding, my boater crushing boots need cleaning. ::: Sound of low moans::: SA: Clive, put it away. CH: Sorry Mistress, I couldn't contain myself. SA: ENOUGH!!! I've called you here to tell you what the IWA's next all out campaign is going to be. CH: I beg your pardon, but the IWA is an independant membership organisation with a constitiution..... SA: SILENCE WORM!!!.. SA: Did we not let you win the laughingly "democratic elections" we ran? Have we not let you climb one step up the greasy pole to an OBE, or even a Knighthood??!!! CH: (quietly) mutter mumble "well yes you did" mutter mumble. SA: Then it's time you repaid our investment clive, we trust you Clive, and you don't want to disappoint me do you clive? CH: no mistress... SA: Then the IWA will decide to run a campaign against Continuous Moorers, it is the worst thing ever on the canals.. CH: (quietly) mutter mumble "but begging your parden mistress, the financial shortfall is worrying the members most" mutter mumble. SA: Clive, don't make me show you what happens when I'm angry!!!! Do you have any idea what I did to Eugene Baston? :::: Sound similar to that of urine landing on a shoe:::: CH: "Sorry Mistress" SA: Then tomorrow, the IWA will unanimously decide that this is the number one issue on the waterways. That would please me Clive, you do want to please me Clive. CH: Yes mistress. Then what happens? SA: We will listen to your campaign, and agree with you, then will begin the great purge... CH: you'll solve the CM problem? Wow Mistress you are truely godlike. may i gaze upon you in wonderment? SA: No you may not Clive. for we don't give 2 hoots about a few bridge hoppers all they do is annoy the plebs. CH: then why? SA: We are going to purge the entire system of the poor, the feckless, and the generally useless. CH: Why? SA: because they detract from the Canal Enjoyment Experience . people who like to have their dogs crap on the towpaths have said they don't like scruffy boats. CH: But won't that have an impact on the finances raised from the licence fees? SA: Why should that bother us? CH: vital funds to keep the network open? SA: We don't care about "the network". The sooner we can close them, the sooner we can become a wildlife charity, and sucker in those stupid ritch greenies, and get them to give us their dosh, by easy to manage monthly installments. CH: But that's not what we signed up to, where will we take our lovely shiny boats? you know the ones with the welded on washers.. SA: SHUP UP YOU WORTHLESS EXCUSE FOR A MAN!!! Write the press release, and release it tomorrow. or I will feed you to my pretties. ::: Sound of a slap ::: ::: Sound suspiciosly like someone defacating into patent leather leaderhosen::: CH: Yes mistress i will do as you desire. SA: Good, now you may admire my greatness... Meeting adjourned. Edited August 28, 2012 by fuzzyduck 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve hayes Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 This from the iwa site "IWA is not alone in having concerns with other organisations, including the trade, demanding action" I like the catch all statement, who are "the trade" ? I does sound like Sally Cash has wound the IWA to deliver her message Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenlyn Posted August 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 There are FAR more serious issues to boaters, infrastructure, repairs (or lack of) and maintenance (or lack of). I am on me moby, but will post a piccy later of the repairs to the flood sluices at Barrow. Plywood and blue string are the solution!! Totally agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter-Bullfinch Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Brilliant Fuzzyduck! If I had ever get to the hallowed status of a greenie giver....you would certainly have received one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tuscan Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 The concern for me is the fact that 5 of the CaRT trustee council members are also IWA members and were actively nominated and supported during the election campaign. I can not see them representing ALL boaters , rather that they will toe the party line and push the IWA focus through regardless. There are FAR more serious issues to boaters, infrastructure, repairs (or lack of) and maintenance (or lack of). I am on me moby, but will post a piccy later of the repairs to the flood sluices at Barrow. Plywood and blue string are the solution!! Totally agree with you but these cost money and need skilled staff. Focussing on CM's is an easier target and is likely to generate a lot of hot air and policy documents leadng to yet another unenforceable strategy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pykebird Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Just what I need to come home to , well done fuzzy duck!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_fincher Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 The concern for me is the fact that 5 of the CaRT trustee council members are also IWA members and were actively nominated and supported during the election campaign. I can not see them representing ALL boaters , rather that they will toe the party line and push the IWA focus through regardless. There are FAR more serious issues to boaters, infrastructure, repairs (or lack of) and maintenance (or lack of). I am on me moby, but will post a piccy later of the repairs to the flood sluices at Barrow. Plywood and blue string are the solution!! Who are the five then ? I know three ...... Henderson, Caplan, Welch who else, and by what route ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PiRSqwared Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 What a coinkidink given the rumour about Angel VM. Could the 2 be connected? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Muck Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Dunno but have known for some time that there's going to be a user group meeting regarding this issue, have been invited as a rep for Tottenham Boaters, as have quite a few cruisers. I expect there will be some fireworks, but we've got to sit down and talk. IWA have changed quite a bit haven't they? Am I right in thinking they fought for the rights of the boaters without moorings threatened with eviction in the 80's in Oxford and the agenda 21 moorings in Oxford were created because of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenlyn Posted August 28, 2012 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 I am not sure the figures quoted are realistic or a true picture. I dont think fuzzy is too far off the truth with his joke. As for the IWA, perhaps Lady Muck should take a poo bag to the meeting and ask Clive Henderson to please clear up after himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan(nb Albert) Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 I am not sure the figures quoted are realistic or a true picture. I dont think fuzzy is too far off the truth with his joke. As for the IWA, perhaps Lady Muck should take a poo bag to the meeting and ask Clive Henderson to please clear up after himself. For what it is worth, Clive is to step down. I note that CART has already made major changes to its licencing T&C's without any public consultation. Fuzzy has it about right and puts it across in a humorous way. I also note that some 15 months after BW were asked about Sally Ash receiving 'perks' (and a threat by the information commissioner to hold BW/CART in contempt of court for not responding) we are now told that she has been having free boating holidays provided by hire boat companies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luctor et emergo Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Another tossuer spouting hogwash. The situation on the Western Side of the K&A is 'acute'? If these people weren't being paid with our licence money, it could almost be funny. As usual, some twerp who has not been on the K&A regurgitates the old 'overcrowding ' tripe. And maybe Sally wants to keep her powder dry. Her beloved hire boats seem to be down in numbers this year. Some companies over sensational discounts at the moment, to try and save some of the season. Some companies are offering three weeks for the price of two. That is a 30% discount... Hirers have no vested interest, and will holiday elsewhere if either price, or the weather, are not to their liking. ) Those pesky liveaboards, who don't want to be hemmed in in a floati g caravan park, do have a vested interest. Try and work with them, instead of against them. Unless, the idea of boats floating in the canal, is an abhorent afterthougth. (Unless it's one of Sally's own boats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allan(nb Albert) Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Another tossuer spouting hogwash. The situation on the Western Side of the K&A is 'acute'? If these people weren't being paid with our licence money, it could almost be funny. As usual, some twerp who has not been on the K&A regurgitates the old 'overcrowding ' tripe. And maybe Sally wants to keep her powder dry. Her beloved hire boats seem to be down in numbers this year. Some companies over sensational discounts at the moment, to try and save some of the season. Some companies are offering three weeks for the price of two. That is a 30% discount... Hirers have no vested interest, and will holiday elsewhere if either price, or the weather, are not to their liking. ) Those pesky liveaboards, who don't want to be hemmed in in a floati g caravan park, do have a vested interest. Try and work with them, instead of against them. Unless, the idea of boats floating in the canal, is an abhorent afterthougth. (Unless it's one of Sally's own boats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luctor et emergo Posted August 28, 2012 Report Share Posted August 28, 2012 Never noticed that echo.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pentargon Posted September 6, 2012 Report Share Posted September 6, 2012 Interesting comments all round and I've read them with an open mind. Now that the canals are run by a Trust, it is possible for 'ordinary' boaters to get actively involved in how the trust conducts its business. The SE region is to run open meetings in October, 18th at Barby and 24th at Tring. I'm attending Barby as it is within my 'radius of action' and it would make great sense if interested partied were to attend their local venue. I would not be going there to stir up shit, rather to to keep abreast of what is ACTUALLY happening rather than what is PRESUMED to be happening. It would also give a great excuse for a banter at a local hostelry or around a camp fire. Any takers or am I talking through my irish hole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now