Jump to content

Foxton in the Mail


Boaty Jo

Featured Posts

Good old journalistic research- the" more modern building in his surrounds" appears to be hiding underneath in the first pic!!

thanks, nice photos.

The paddles must have been quite hard work (or maybe boaters were fitter then), as those paddles had no reduction gearing.

I wonder when they were painted red & white?...

.

After someone wrote that useful little poem...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks, nice photos.

 

The paddles must have been quite hard work (or maybe boaters were fitter then), as those paddles had no reduction gearing.

 

I wonder when they were painted red & white?...

.

Lots of paddles over the system don't have reduction gearing. In fact I would say a majority of ground paddles don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lots of paddles over the system don't have reduction gearing. In fact I would say a majority of ground paddles don't.

indeed so. That is because most ground paddles are only 3-4 feet below ground level, while those on a staircase are rather deeper. I would also expect those at Foxton etc to be bigger, as they are singles targe than pairs. Both factors add to the weight to be lifted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks, nice photos.

 

The paddles must have been quite hard work (or maybe boaters were fitter then), as those paddles had no reduction gearing.

 

I wonder when they were painted red & white?...

.

 

Certainly since the 1970's when they were still painted white.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

indeed so. That is because most ground paddles are only 3-4 feet below ground level, while those on a staircase are rather deeper. I would also expect those at Foxton etc to be bigger, as they are singles targe than pairs. Both factors add to the weight to be lifted.

Good point smile.png

 

But back in the day they probably weren't worn and they were greased daily smile.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good old journalistic research- the" more modern building in his surrounds" appears to be hiding underneath in the first pic!!

...

No "appears" about it, you're obviously right.

It never ceases to amaze me how lazy some journalists can be; look at the caption of the older photo:

"A man sits on a wooden plank...". How did this person get a job writing for a national newspaper, when there are plenty of unemployed English graduates who'd love the job and know the language well enough to distinguish a plank from a beam?

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No "appears" about it, you're obviously right.

It never ceases to amaze me how lazy some journalists can be; look at the caption of the older photo:

"A man sits on a wooden plank...". How did this person get a job writing for a national newspaper, when there are plenty of unemployed English graduates who'd love the job and know the language well enough to distinguish a plank from a beam?

 

I was going to comment on the "plank" earlier but adding updates from a Samsung Tablet isn't as easy as I thought (now on a proper computer)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good old journalistic research- the" more modern building in his surrounds" appears to be hiding underneath in the first pic!!

You could argue that it is a modern building built in the same style as the original on the original foundations... smile.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

A man sits on a wooden plank...

 

I hate photo captions which just describe the picture from a position of ignorance. I can see its a man sitting on a balance beam for myself. But an interesting set of pictures.

Edited by Mr Badger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No "appears" about it, you're obviously right.

It never ceases to amaze me how lazy some journalists can be; look at the caption of the older photo:

"A man sits on a wooden plank...".

 

followed by "in the present day a gentleman sits on the same wooden plank..."

 

That is not the same wooden 'plank'. It has probably been replaced 3, 4 or 5 times since the first photo!

 

And "A computerised image shows how little the house has changed in after hundreds of years with visitors gathering around its entrance and admiring the canal boats"

 

Of course it hasn't changed in that image - they've pasted the old view of the cottage into a modern photo. Would be more helpfu to have the full modern photo to compare!

 

The two images of the top and bottom of the incline showing how little has changed are misleading. If you had gone there in the 1960s it would all have looked very different. The incline was completely overgrown. It has been cleared back to more like its original form since then.

 

 

Edited by David Mack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.