Jump to content

Widebeam from Blackthorn Lakes to Hartford Marina: Possible or crane-out?


Featured Posts

I believe 60x10 is the maximum for a widebeam at Whittlesea , or 72x7 for a narrowboat, so you should be OK.  The locks are 11'6", from memory. 

You should talk to the lockkeeper at Salters Lode, to check whether you need to go through on the level (it's a short lock) or can use it in normal mode. I think you should be OK....  Check the ML leaflet 

https://middlelevel.wpenginepowered.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Navigation-Notes-2023-web-version-3.pdf
 

More stuff here.


https://goba.org.uk/a-guide-for-visitors-to-the-east/  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with everything Scholar Gypsy says plus

On the Great Ouse the only lock that might give you a problem is St Ives which is quoted at 10' 11" on this link:

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/river-great-ouse-bridge-heights-locks-and-facilities#river-great-ouse-locks 

 

The downstream approach to the gates is "kinked" which happened when they put strengthening sheet piling in some years ago.

You are probably short enough to be able to wriggle thru!

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CIEL said:

Agree with everything Scholar Gypsy says plus

On the Great Ouse the only lock that might give you a problem is St Ives which is quoted at 10' 11" on this link:

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/river-great-ouse-bridge-heights-locks-and-facilities#river-great-ouse-locks 

 

The downstream approach to the gates is "kinked" which happened when they put strengthening sheet piling in some years ago.

You are probably short enough to be able to wriggle thru!

Chris

St Ives not a problem. We're 60 X10 and pass through regularly. Go on a summer weekend and the volunteers will do the work for you.

Edited by pearley
  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CIEL said:

Agree with everything Scholar Gypsy says plus

On the Great Ouse the only lock that might give you a problem is St Ives which is quoted at 10' 11" on this link:

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/river-great-ouse-bridge-heights-locks-and-facilities#river-great-ouse-locks 

 

The downstream approach to the gates is "kinked" which happened when they put strengthening sheet piling in some years ago.

You are probably short enough to be able to wriggle thru!

Chris

Ive been through St Ives on a 60 x 10 several times and it isnt a problem.

@SprayfoamMakesMeHappy One of the local 60 x 10 widebeams has been through the Middle Level no problems both directions

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You legends! I’m blown away by the promptness and level of detail. Thank you so much. A kinky lock too…could be a wild ride

1 hour ago, booke23 said:

Canal plan says it's possible. 4 or 5 days cruising depending where you are on the Nene.

Yeah I saw that too, but I couldn’t figure out how to generate a result for my boat’s spec. Sounds like you did tho…?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SprayfoamMakesMeHappy said:

Yeah I saw that too, but I couldn’t figure out how to generate a result for my boat’s spec. Sounds like you did tho…?

 

Yes, once you've planned the route go to preferences at the top of the page, then the planning tab. There it will let you put in the dimensions of your boat and it will plan the route accordingly. 

Edited by booke23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, SprayfoamMakesMeHappy said:

You legends! I’m blown away by the promptness and level of detail. Thank you so much. A kinky lock too…could be a wild ride

Yeah I saw that too, but I couldn’t figure out how to generate a result for my boat’s spec. Sounds like you did tho…?

The kinky Lock is only a problem if there is a stream running as the EA tend to open the Sluice gate nearest the Lock so pushing you around as you enter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 22/01/2024 at 20:23, GUMPY said:

Should I mention airdraft at Upwell🤔

 


Absolutely.  On the second photo, I have reported this in September to Norfolk County Council, as I don't think it is a good sign if you can see the metal bars in a reinforced concrete bridge. They were going to inspect it but I don't know if anything more is happening. Quite apart from bits of concrete landing on you (or even worse your solar panels) there's quite a bit of heavy lorry traffic over this bridge!

 

dsc_5854.jpg

 

dsc_5857.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SprayfoamMakesMeHappy said:

Yiiiiiikes

That's not going to end well, is it.

Maybe go direct to the council's legal team if you don't get a timely response...?

 

I would move my boat first if I was you. They may just close it until they can get round to fixing it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Scholar Gypsy said:


Absolutely.  On the second photo, I have reported this in September to Norfolk County Council, as I don't think it is a good sign if you can see the metal bars in a reinforced concrete bridge. They were going to inspect it but I don't know if anything more is happening. Quite apart from bits of concrete landing on you (or even worse your solar panels) there's quite a bit of heavy lorry traffic over this bridge!

 

dsc_5854.jpg

 

dsc_5857.jpg

Loddon would go under there with 50mm to spare and it's not a particularly tall boat. It would have been more if I had removed the 4g antenna.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scholar Gypsy said:

 

dsc_5857.jpg

Be careful what you wish for! The concrete cover to the reinforcement is clearly inadequate. The appropriate repair will involve removing any loose concrete, cleaning the reinforcement, replacing any areas which have significantly lost cross section, then covering with a sprayed concrete layer thick enough to protect the reinforcement. That would result in a reduction in the available headroom of 20-50 mm, and possibly more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, David Mack said:

Be careful what you wish for! The concrete cover to the reinforcement is clearly inadequate. The appropriate repair will involve removing any loose concrete, cleaning the reinforcement, replacing any areas which have significantly lost cross section, then covering with a sprayed concrete layer thick enough to protect the reinforcement. That would result in a reduction in the available headroom of 20-50 mm, and possibly more.


I checked the ticket on the Council's website, and it says the following, a few months ago (sorry I should have checked this earlier!):

 

"No action has been taken at this time but we will continue to monitor the problem -We have assessed that the defect does not currently meet our intervention criteria. We will continue to monitor as part of normal scheduled inspections."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.