Jump to content

Grand Union Bridge Numbering


John Brightley

Featured Posts

It is a road bridge, according to Canalplan. The next bridge, 49B is a railway bridge. There is no station now, but there was  once, plus a junction to a disused railway. https://streetmap.co.uk/map?x=472256&y=254409&z=0&sv=NN7+3DS&st=2&pc=NN7+3DS&mapp=map&searchp=ids

Could still be a railway infrastructure number, if Station Road was once owned and maintained by the railway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Various railway infrastructure information is available online at www.railwaycodes.org.uk.

 

I wasn’t sure if it had bridge numbers and I’d have to resort to official means.
 

It is indeed a side bridge of the WCML at 62m 51ch from London Euston. However apparently now managed by the Highways Authority (isn’t that called something else these days?).

 

Edited by Captain Pegg
  • Greenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Highways Authority is the body responsible for a particular bit of road.  Motorways and some Trunk Roads are looked after by the Highways Agency.  Most of the rest are looked after by  County Highways bodies ( e.g. Bucks Highways).  Some local roads get to be a Council responsibility.  Somd roads are the responsibility of the residents.

In this case it looks like Notwork Rail has shuffled the road and the bridge off to, probably, Northamptonshire Highways.

N

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BEngo said:

The Highways Authority is the body responsible for a particular bit of road.  Motorways and some Trunk Roads are looked after by the Highways Agency.  Most of the rest are looked after by  County Highways bodies ( e.g. Bucks Highways).  Some local roads get to be a Council responsibility.  Somd roads are the responsibility of the residents.

In this case it looks like Notwork Rail has shuffled the road and the bridge off to, probably, Northamptonshire Highways.

N


The Highways Agency is now National Highways, having been Highways England in the interim.

 

As a piece of non-operational infrastructure the bridge would not have transferred to Network Rail from the BRB at privatisation. Such assets were retained by BRB Residual until about a decade ago when they did transfer to NR. Hence I suspect the responsibility for this bridge has never sat with NR.

 

The main point is that it is a road overbridge and therefore best managed by the same authority as the highway it bears.

Edited by Captain Pegg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canal bridges were originally identified by a number, letter or name, though some had several alternate names over time. On nationalisation, there was a programme to identify which bridges were the responsibility of the canal authority, and which were came under railway or road authorities. There were also aqueducts for water supply, etc. On the surveys done in 1826/7 of the L&LC after it was completed, bridge names are used, with a consecutive numbering for bridges added in pencil, which dates from the 1950s survey. Subsequently, a review was done nationally of the type, condition and ownership of all bridges in the 1960s. From this, on the L&LC, those bridges owned by BW had a simple number, while those which were the responsibility of others used an additional letter added to the number of the nearest BW bridge on the Liverpool side. This was done by NW engineering, with a lock survey done by NE engineering, so lock numbers begin at Leeds. 

  • Greenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.