nebulae Posted October 30, 2014 Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 My copy of Bradshaws Canals and Navigable Rivers is a David and Charles reprint 1969 edition.In the section on the Staffs and Worcester,the maximum size of vessels is given as "Length 72ft ,Width 6ft 9in.Draught 4ft ,Headroom8ft 8in.(Page 368). Bradshaws is not noted for errors,is this genuinely the max size the company was prepared to guarantee passage.Anybody any ideas about this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nebulae Posted October 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 Just to be clear,its the width that I question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matty40s Posted October 30, 2014 Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 i always think the staffs and worcs is tight,some of the deep locks are deceptive. I did see an old boat last winter struggle to fit into the lock at Deptmore Lock, and it is a canal I would not be comfortable using fenders in any locks(some boats I move have low level fenders impossible to remove, so I just have to lift them onto the gunnels....and hope they stay there). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave moore Posted October 30, 2014 Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 Resolute draws 6'11" and I've never had a problem with any of the locks on the Staffs and Worcs. 6'9" seems a bit pessimistic to me. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Mack Posted October 30, 2014 Report Share Posted October 30, 2014 Resolute draws 6'11" when measured horizontally ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave moore Posted October 31, 2014 Report Share Posted October 31, 2014 Whoops! Beam me up, I blame Shiraz. Taa Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie patrick Posted October 31, 2014 Report Share Posted October 31, 2014 Yep, 6 foot 9 was the maximum the company were prepared to guarantee passage for: in practice, very few vessels would navigate that the canal company were not familiar with so there was no one standing around with a yardstick. Boats generally used a limited set of routes and seldom left them. Whilst all narrowboats historically were "about" the same size, there was no absolute standard. Shropshire Union Boats were all a tad on the narrow side, the fly boats particularly so, Grand Union Canal narrow boats were on the large side. Doesn't mean wider boats won't fit though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pluto Posted October 31, 2014 Report Share Posted October 31, 2014 The dimensions are those quoted in the returns to the Board of Trade with regard to the 1888 Railway & Canal Traffic Act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rufford Posted October 31, 2014 Report Share Posted October 31, 2014 Im yet to have a problem on that end of the Staffs & Worc's in RUFFORD. Some locks can feel a little tight but she fits in.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X Alan W Posted October 31, 2014 Report Share Posted October 31, 2014 (edited) In the late 60's early 70's Compton lock was always a problem for my Josher Motor, but the Little Woolwich butty I never had problems with, & I could pass Hurleston locks with no problem with either boat. I think it was all down to where the boat & lock bulges did or didn't line up. Edited October 31, 2014 by X Alan W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now