Gary Peacock Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 (edited) The next build featured HERE is looking very likely to have a new concept fitted Jet Thrusters. THE WILLDO JET THRUSTERS ARE DRIVEN HYDRAULICALLY (NOT ELECTRICALLY) BY THE PROPULSION ENGINE. A HYDRAULIC PUMP, WHICH IS FITTED ONTO THE PROPULSION ENGINE, DRIVES A HYDRAULIC MOTOR, LOCATED IN THE PUMP HOUSING, WHICH IN TURN ACTIVATES A WATER PUMP, THAT SUCKS IN THE WATER THROUGH AN OPENING IN THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT AND PRESSES IT WITH GREAT FORCE, VIA HOSES WITH AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF NO MORE THAN 45 MM, TO THE NOZZLES IN THE SIDES OF THE BOAT. More info can be found HERE Edited February 20, 2008 by Gary Peacock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris-B Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Stunning can I have an extra "take of point" so I can pressure wash the unlicenced,bridgehoppers,scrotes who untie boats and the bloody ducks who peck on the side of our boat at 5 am Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broughton 2 Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 The next build featured HERE is looking very likely to have a new concept fitted Jet Thrusters. THE WILLDO JET THRUSTERS ARE DRIVEN HYDRAULICALLY (NOT ELECTRICALLY) BY THE PROPULSION ENGINE. A HYDRAULIC PUMP, WHICH IS FITTED ONTO THE PROPULSION ENGINE, DRIVES A HYDRAULIC MOTOR, LOCATED IN THE PUMP HOUSING, WHICH IN TURN ACTIVATES A WATER PUMP, THAT SUCKS IN THE WATER THROUGH AN OPENING IN THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT AND PRESSES IT WITH GREAT FORCE, VIA HOSES WITH AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF NO MORE THAN 45 MM, TO THE NOZZLES IN THE SIDES OF THE BOAT. More info can be found HERE I note on the Willdo site they offer 'Hydraulic drive 360' which, if suitable for a narrowboat, offers I suppose the prospect of better reverse steering. 'Though it wouldn't please some I say bring it on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinJ Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 THE WILLDO JET THRUSTERS ARE DRIVEN HYDRAULICALLY (NOT ELECTRICALLY) BY THE PROPULSION ENGINE.A HYDRAULIC PUMP, WHICH IS FITTED ONTO THE PROPULSION ENGINE, DRIVES A HYDRAULIC MOTOR, LOCATED IN THE PUMP HOUSING, WHICH IN TURN ACTIVATES A WATER PUMP, THAT SUCKS IN THE WATER THROUGH AN OPENING IN THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT AND PRESSES IT WITH GREAT FORCE, VIA HOSES WITH AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF NO MORE THAN 45 MM, TO THE NOZZLES IN THE SIDES OF THE BOAT. Looks very similar to an idea I had many years ago using swivel nozzles front and back. I discounted it from cost, and likelyhood of damage (as the nozzles would have been some sort of rubber). This looks like a better concept! What are the likely problems on the intake side? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoda Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I could harnessd that idea to give me the extra oommpf to accelerate to water skiing mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsk Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I am disgusted by the whole tawdry potential installation. Whyohwhyohwhyo....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrose Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 (edited) Looks very similar to an idea I had many years ago using swivel nozzles front and back.I discounted it from cost, and likelyhood of damage (as the nozzles would have been some sort of rubber). This looks like a better concept! What are the likely problems on the intake side? I think swiveling thrusters are already in use, but as you say, the problem is that they do not form an integral part of the hull and can get damaged. Jet thrusters eh? The traditionalists are not going to be happy... Yes, getting muck in the intake side must definately be an issue - are these already used on seagoing boats Gary? Also, since the hydraulic unit is run from the propulsion engine, is it going to suffer from the problems associated with many hydraulically driven bow thrusters? Namely that the user needs to rev the engine (in neutral) in order to get any power from the unit. Edited February 20, 2008 by blackrose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NB Phoenix Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 THE WILLDO JET THRUSTERS ARE DRIVEN HYDRAULICALLY (NOT ELECTRICALLY) BY THE PROPULSION ENGINE.A HYDRAULIC PUMP, WHICH IS FITTED ONTO THE PROPULSION ENGINE, DRIVES A HYDRAULIC MOTOR, LOCATED IN THE PUMP HOUSING, WHICH IN TURN ACTIVATES A WATER PUMP, THAT SUCKS IN THE WATER THROUGH AN OPENING IN THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT AND PRESSES IT WITH GREAT FORCE, VIA HOSES WITH AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF NO MORE THAN 45 MM, TO THE NOZZLES IN THE SIDES OF THE BOAT. How well will it pump shopping trolleys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Peacock Posted February 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I think swiveling thrusters are already in use, but as you say, the problem is that they do not form an integral part of the hull and can get damaged. Jet thrusters eh? The traditionalists are not going to be happy... Yes, getting muck in the intake side must definately be an issue - are these already used on seagoing boats Gary? Also, since the hydraulic unit is run from the propulsion engine, is it going to suffer from the problems associated with many hydraulically driven bow thrusters? Namely that the user needs to rev the engine (in neutral) in order to get any power from the unit. This is going to be a bit of a case of installing "not specifying" but the manufacturer seems to be working with the customer to resolve the potential problems. The system is in use in the blue water world where the inlet is normally in the boats bottom obviously for this application this will have to change while the hydraulic side is supposed to be optimised for low RPM to get around the problems that normal hydraulic bow thrusters tend to suffer. If the systems gets installed it will be very much down to the manufacturers answers to the customer about potential problems. I am keeping an open mind on it at the moment but I would really like to see it installed and in action. It seems to overcome a lot of the standard smaller problems if it can avoid introducing any more major ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLWP Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I was wondering, would you have to talk to BW about the potential for bank erosion before installing these in a narrowboat? Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoda Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I think that it would be very soon that the pump was damaged severely, costing x thousands more. This is a good idea but not for ditch water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsk Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I think that it would be very soon that the pump was damaged severely, costing x thousands more. This is a good idea but not for ditch water. First thing sensible said you. All round socks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrose Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 (edited) I think it's got to be a worthwhile installation even if it doesn't work. It might cost thousands & prove to be a complete headache, but when it does work it's going to drive the traditionalists mad and to me that's its real value. Edited February 20, 2008 by blackrose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsk Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I think it's a worthwhile installation even if it doesn't work. It might cost thousands & prove to be a complete headache, but when it does work it's going to drive the traditionalists mad and to me that's its real value. Spoken like a true idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrose Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Spoken like a true idiot. From one idiot to another I couldn't agree more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick_B Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Spoken like a true idiot. From one idiot to another I couldn't agree more. Now Children..... Stop it before someone gets hurt!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisPy Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 we used pipeline burial machines like that. dredges a channel under where the intake/s are located. BW will love it, no more dredging. (we used to jet the water/mud in a big arc into the air). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrose Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 Now Children..... Stop it before someone gets hurt!!!!!! It's ok, me & Tomsk go way back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomsk Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 It's ok, me & Tomsk go way back... For once I agree, Do Not Panic, Step Away From The Rap Record!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris w Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 For once I agree, Do Not Panic, Step Away From The Rap Record!!! Whatever you're smokin', pass it round..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnetman Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 This looks like a good system, i'd like to see a 'holding tank' which is filled with water 'at leisure' via a jabsco or something from which the jet can draw water on the occasions that a certain thruster was required. Maybe it uses too much water. If this system really works, 45mm nozzles, i'd have nine of them 2 each side and 2 angled a bit at bows and stern and one in the stempost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NB Phoenix Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 This looks like a good system, i'd like to see a 'holding tank' which is filled with water 'at leisure' via a jabsco or something from which the jet can draw water on the occasions that a certain thruster was required. Maybe it uses too much water. If this system really works, 45mm nozzles, i'd have nine of them 2 each side and 2 angled a bit at bows and stern and one in the stempost. I think you would look something like this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malarky Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 I think you would look something like this... [ Maybee it could have a hose and take off to be something like that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sideways Posted February 20, 2008 Report Share Posted February 20, 2008 The next build featured HERE is looking very likely to have a new concept fitted Jet Thrusters. THE WILLDO JET THRUSTERS ARE DRIVEN HYDRAULICALLY (NOT ELECTRICALLY) BY THE PROPULSION ENGINE. A HYDRAULIC PUMP, WHICH IS FITTED ONTO THE PROPULSION ENGINE, DRIVES A HYDRAULIC MOTOR, LOCATED IN THE PUMP HOUSING, WHICH IN TURN ACTIVATES A WATER PUMP, THAT SUCKS IN THE WATER THROUGH AN OPENING IN THE BOTTOM OF THE BOAT AND PRESSES IT WITH GREAT FORCE, VIA HOSES WITH AN INSIDE DIAMETER OF NO MORE THAN 45 MM, TO THE NOZZLES IN THE SIDES OF THE BOAT. More info can be found HERE Vetus had a unit that looked very much like this on the market a little over 20 years ago. I installed one and it did work but was sadly lacking in thrust. Vetus quickly dropped the idea. I would imagine that it will need at least 1800 lbs of pressure and a minimum of 8 gallons a minute hydraulic capacity. That will require about 20HP. Will the main engine supply that at idle? If you had that kind of hydraulic power then you would be better off with a standard hydraulic tunnel thruster. The available thrust I find in the Willdo site is dismal for this unit. It may be OK on a NB but will be more expensive and less powerful than a standard thruster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now