Jump to content

WEIGHTS and MEASURES


Featured Posts

Could one of you geniuses on here please do a mathematical problem for me.This is the question;I have a plastic container that measures in old money,22 inches x 6ft x 5inches deep.I need the total amount of volume in litres and then this converting to weight.Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could one of you geniuses on here please do a mathematical problem for me.This is the question;I have a plastic container that measures in old money,22 inches x 6ft x 5inches deep.I need the total amount of volume in litres and then this converting to weight.Thanks.

Edited to correct miscalc I make that 129.79 litres which, filled with water, would be 129.79 kg.

Roger

Edited by Albion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, convert all measurements to inches, so 22" x 72" x 5"

 

multiply all measurements by 25.4 to get them in millimetres 558.8 x 1828.8 x 127

 

multiply all measurements together to get volume in cubic millimetres 129785546.88

 

divide by 1,000,000 to get volume in litres 129.786 to 3dp, or just under 130 litres if you don't need perfect accuracy.

 

Edited to add, how much it weighs will depend on the density of whatever you fill it with. for water that's about 130kg. For diesel the value can vary quite a bit, the list I've found suggests 0.85 to 0.92 kg per litre, which would result in a value between 110kg and 120kg (roughly).

Edited by Teadaemon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could one of you geniuses on here please do a mathematical problem for me.This is the question;I have a plastic container that measures in old money,22 inches x 6ft x 5inches deep.I need the total amount of volume in litres and then this converting to weight.Thanks.

 

Assuming these are the internal dimensions of the container:

 

4.583 cubic feet = 129.8 litres. If filled with water the contents will weigh 1.3 tonnes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming these are the internal dimensions of the container:

 

4.583 cubic feet = 129.8 litres. If filled with water the contents will weigh 1.3 tonnes.

 

Er no sir

 

129.8 kg - you are out by a factor of ten

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was really quick by all of you,thanks very much.(water by the way)

 

129.8 according to my son...

Good lad,he will do well.

 

Edited to correct miscalc I make that 129.79 litres which, filled with water, would be 129.79 kg.

Roger

Not bad Roger :cheers:

 

Heavy water?

1.3 tons,brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could one of you geniuses on here please do a mathematical problem for me.This is the question;I have a plastic container that measures in old money,22 inches x 6ft x 5inches deep.I need the total amount of volume in litres and then this converting to weight.Thanks.

 

You could do it in old money.

;)

In feet,22/12 x 6 x 5/12 = 4.58 cu ft

x 6.25 = 28.6 gallons.

For water, 1 gallon weighs 10 lb, so 286 lb, or 130 kg, near as dammit.

 

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the reasons for the calculations.I am thinking of placing said plastic container(baffled and for drinking water)one third down the boat from the bow as an extra tank.This will give extra range for liveaboards and cc'ers and also help to ballast the boat(widebeam) a bit a more as I feel the bow and the boat overall could do with lowering a bit.I could quite easily add some more ballast when furniture,clothes and all the other liveaboard stuff as been added but I might as well add weight that will be usable.Your thoughts and criticism invited as ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now the reasons for the calculations.I am thinking of placing said plastic container(baffled and for drinking water)one third down the boat from the bow as an extra tank.This will give extra range for liveaboards and cc'ers and also help to ballast the boat(widebeam) a bit a more as I feel the bow and the boat overall could do with lowering a bit.I could quite easily add some more ballast when furniture,clothes and all the other liveaboard stuff as been added but I might as well add weight that will be usable.Your thoughts and criticism invited as ever.

 

The problem with using water in a tank as ballast is that you lose any effect when the tank is empty.

 

If the boat needs more ballast to trim it correctly then it needs something more permanent I would say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OT: Martin I have only just noticed that you have changed your forum name from MJG to The Dog House. I know it's the name of your boat, but I assume that MJG are your initials; what prompted the change?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with using water in a tank as ballast is that you lose any effect when the tank is empty.

 

If the boat needs more ballast to trim it correctly then it needs something more permanent I would say.

Yes,quite right but it would only brought into use as a back up.Yer know,when in shower and yer know yer should have got water at the last watering hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OT: Martin I have only just noticed that you have changed your forum name from MJG to The Dog House. I know it's the name of your boat, but I assume that MJG are your initials; what prompted the change?

 

Nothing other than it's the name of our boat and a good few forum members match the name of their boat to their forum name.

 

I've always loved the boats name and it's more interesting than three boring initials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes,quite right but it would only brought into use as a back up.Yer know,when in shower and yer know yer should have got water at the last watering hole.

 

I can see the benefit of having a backup, other than if it's not drawn on very often it could stagnate, if it is not drawn on for drinking water though then this of course would not be an problem, unless of course we ignite the whole Legionella discussion again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see the benefit of having a backup, other than if it's not drawn on very often it could stagnate, if it is not drawn on for drinking water though then this of course would not be an problem, unless of course we ignite the whole Legionella discussion again.

No, this tank would be drawn from first as it is in line from the main tank.

Edited by bowten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep well done bizzard.

 

Fairy nuff I'm out

 

- I'm having problems visualising what you are proposing in the absence of a diagram.

 

Other than all you are doing is creating a bigger tank overall which will run out at some point if you push things thinking you have more capacity and then.........

 

drip drip drip...no water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fairy nuff I'm out

 

- I'm having problems visualising what you are proposing in the absence of a diagram.

 

Other than all you are doing is creating a bigger tank overall which will run out at some point if you push things thinking you have more capacity and then.........

 

drip drip drip...no water.

Now now ,don't go.The idea is to use any extra ballast as a useful item,it would be useful if you are gaining a larger tank.I know the scenario you are suggesting but I doubt this would happen too often.I asked for constructive criticism and that's what you did and thankyou.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.