carlt Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 What daves survey has shown is that the need to review recreational drug laws in this country has never been more apparent. You can't force him to take them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naughty Cal Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 You can't force him to take them. No but nurse can. NURSE......... NURSE............NURSE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wanted Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 You can't force him to take them. Chocolate brownie anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naughty Cal Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 Chocolate brownie anyone? No bt i will have a cup of THAT tea please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wanted Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 No bt i will have a cup of THAT tea please Who'd of thought that this thread would have ended with me and Phylis getting stoned! The crazy world of CWDF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLWP Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 Who'd of thought that this thread would have ended with me and Phylis getting stoned! The crazy world of CWDF! Not that unusual, it's what we often do with outcasts Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 You can't force him to take them. Chocolate brownie anyone? Who'd of thought that this thread would have ended with me and Phylis getting stoned! Oh......I thought it was a suppository joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grace and Favour Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 Oh......I thought it was a suppository joke. Has there been a 'run' on them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canaldrifter Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 Has there been a 'run' on them? Loosely, yes. Tone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenlyn Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 I will be doing shortly. You will be pleased to know that I will not be contributing anything further to this thread. I engage in robust debate, and I expect the same in return. I also expect certain individuals to substitute shouting abuse for debate, and I expect the moderators to ignore it, because it makes them popular. Regrettably, tonight, a number of people have gone beyond that and made extraordinarily silly veiled threats of violence that the moderators have chosen to ignore, because it makes them popular. With a small number of notable exceptions (most of whom don't agree with much of what I believe, but do agree that I should be able to say it without threats), many people on the forum that I normally consider to be rational individuals appear to have sided with the "If you voice an unpopular opinion, and somebody threatens you, you should just be quiet and the bully will leave you alone" viewpoint. And that is all that I wish to say here. having read this thread twice, i see no threats being issued, ( i do think you are barking mad tho ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wanted Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 Loosely, yes. Tone I second that motion! Not that unusual, it's what we often do with outcasts Richard Wolfs nipple chips! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cotswoldsman Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 (edited) ( i do think you are barking mad tho ). Have you done a survey for this? Do you have the relevant data to back up that statement?? Edited for spelling!!! AGAIN Edited February 10, 2011 by cotswoldsman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbo Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 OP may not be the most popular member on here. With a bit of imagination stretching it's even possible that he's more unpopular than me. But this entire thread, as I see it, is one perfect example of a huge pile of big boys ganging together and letting one person (OP) "have it" for daring to make a suggestion. I do see thinly veiled threats. I also see moderators ignoring them. I don't think I've ever seen such an example of bullying since primary school. It's happened in the past on this forum, and on those occasions the thread has been locked and the perpetrators' posts removed. There was one old regular (thankfully no longer around) who seemed to be able to say what the f*ck he wanted without reprimand but when anyone dared to give him his same treatment back they were soon shown the whip. I often wondered whether there was a sexual relationship involved to result in such favouritism. Do I sense some negative-favouritism in this case? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 Other forums are available... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 OP may not be the most popular member on here. With a bit of imagination stretching it's even possible that he's more unpopular than me. But this entire thread, as I see it, is one perfect example of a huge pile of big boys ganging together and letting one person (OP) "have it" for daring to make a suggestion. I do see thinly veiled threats. I also see moderators ignoring them. I don't think I've ever seen such an example of bullying since primary school. It's happened in the past on this forum, and on those occasions the thread has been locked and the perpetrators' posts removed. There was one old regular (thankfully no longer around) who seemed to be able to say what the f*ck he wanted without reprimand but when anyone dared to give him his same treatment back they were soon shown the whip. I often wondered whether there was a sexual relationship involved to result in such favouritism. Do I sense some negative-favouritism in this case? interesting to see you referring to others using 'playground behaviour' and letting someone 'have it' for daring to make a suggestion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbo Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 interesting to see you referring to others using 'playground behaviour' and letting someone 'have it' for daring to make a suggestion Clearly my post, the phrasing and the (note this part) words in quotes, were way beyond your intelligence and comprehension. Why does that not surprise me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 well well well and there you go again It seems name calling and sneering at people is your forte And you have the gall to accuse others Hypocrisy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 Clearly my post, the phrasing and the (note this part) words in quotes, were way beyond your intelligence and comprehension. Why does that not surprise me? Patronising git... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NB Alnwick Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 OP may not be the most popular member on here. With a bit of imagination stretching it's even possible that he's more unpopular than me. But this entire thread, as I see it, is one perfect example of a huge pile of big boys ganging together and letting one person (OP) "have it" for daring to make a suggestion. I do see thinly veiled threats. I also see moderators ignoring them. I don't think I've ever seen such an example of bullying since primary school. It's happened in the past on this forum, and on those occasions the thread has been locked and the perpetrators' posts removed. There was one old regular (thankfully no longer around) who seemed to be able to say what the f*ck he wanted without reprimand but when anyone dared to give him his same treatment back they were soon shown the whip. I often wondered whether there was a sexual relationship involved to result in such favouritism. Do I sense some negative-favouritism in this case? In times past, the moderators have tried their best to take action where appropriate and act impartially. Unfortunately, one member appears to have fallen out with the majority of the moderators on this forum and has made it clear they should not involve themselves in reports, complaints and other matters relating to him/her. As a result, the site owner, is obliged to deal with such matters personally and that may take a little longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenlyn Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 looks left, looks right, (wheres that green cross code man) is it safe to cross yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 looks left, looks right, (wheres that green cross code man) is it safe to cross yet? No I don't think it's you... is it me do you think??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenlyn Posted February 10, 2011 Report Share Posted February 10, 2011 deffinately not me, am on HRT at min, (very calming) tho i do wish marks and sparks did a decent guys bra! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbo Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 Patronising git... It is sometimes necessary, especially when someone is too daft to understand it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imnogeek Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 In times past, the moderators have tried their best to take action where appropriate and act impartially. Unfortunately, one member appears to have fallen out with the majority of the moderators on this forum and has made it clear they should not involve themselves in reports, complaints and other matters relating to him/her. As a result, the site owner, is obliged to deal with such matters personally and that may take a little longer. @Mods My view on this.. When we join up to any forum we are accepting the rules of that forum, we are also required to adhere to requests made by moderators. You are moderators, you step in when you think necessary and if we don't agree with your decision then we should be able to ask a senior member of staff (in this case Daniel) to re-asses the decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaggle Posted February 11, 2011 Report Share Posted February 11, 2011 (edited) @Mods My view on this.. When we join up to any forum we are accepting the rules of that forum, we are also required to adhere to requests made by moderators. YES , what rules have been broken and what mod has made a request that is not being adhere,d to. You are moderators, you step in when you think necessary and if we don't agree with your decision then we should be able to ask a senior member of staff (in this case Daniel) to re-asses the decision. Is that not the way things are now. Edited February 11, 2011 by gaggle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts