KeithL Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 I was at the docks this week and the boat (Angelwood) is being cleaned out: I heard that there was no bulkhead - and when the engine bay started taking in water (possibly weed hatch?) then the boat started sinking fast. Rob Im interested to know how much water you need to have floating around inside a narror boat before it'll start going down ? i suppose it depends on how low any engine vents are positioned ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_fincher Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Im interested to know how much water you need to have floating around inside a narror boat before it'll start going down ? i suppose it depends on how low any engine vents are positioned ? Not in the case where a weed hatch is not put back right, or even at all. Once enough water has got in to bring the top of the weed hatch sides level with the cut, it can then be a bit like drawing a paddle, and the boat can go down within minutes. Doesn't need any extra hull apertures to achieve this, unfortunately. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Mack Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Not in the case where a weed hatch is not put back right, or even at all. Once enough water has got in to bring the top of the weed hatch sides level with the cut, it can then be a bit like drawing a paddle, and the boat can go down within minutes. Doesn't need any extra hull apertures to achieve this, unfortunately. The BSS used to require that weedhatch openings were at least 6 inches above water level, and other openings at least 10 inches. On that basis a boat wouldn't actually sink until the stern had gone down by 6 inches, and even without a weedhatch cover fitted at all, that should buy you some time to realise there's a problem. As it is, some boats seem to have the weedhatch much lower, and you might not realise the boat was low in the water before the unstoppable inrush. David Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie patrick Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 The BSS used to require that weedhatch openings were at least 6 inches above water level, and other openings at least 10 inches. On that basis a boat wouldn't actually sink until the stern had gone down by 6 inches, and even without a weedhatch cover fitted at all, that should buy you some time to realise there's a problem. As it is, some boats seem to have the weedhatch much lower, and you might not realise the boat was low in the water before the unstoppable inrush. David Well they did, but have you tried reaching a propeller where there is six inches of freeboard on the weedhatch? I have, because Ripple's does, and it's a pain. The problem is that if the propeller turns with the weedhatch off the water needed to sink a boat enters very, very quickly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keeping Up Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 I wonder what size of sealed engine compartment would be needed, before the boat would still float anyway (as the Titanic was supposed to do) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie patrick Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 I wonder what size of sealed engine compartment would be needed, before the boat would still float anyway (as the Titanic was supposed to do) Well, by my reckoning Ripple probably couldn't sink with a simple leak into the engine compartment, but the propeller actually throwing the stuff in would be curtains. On problem with many trads is that there is no bulkhead between the weedhatch and the cabin, and also no lifting plate on the counter. I have several times lifted the deckboards on Ripple to check things are alright, and if I suspected the back were getting low, I'd have the deck plate up in a second, on many trads, the first warning is when there is water in the cabin. This isn't a problem with Trads per se, but it is possibly a design failing. If I filled Ripple's bilge to canal water level, I don't think she'd sink far enough for the exhaust to go under water (although the weedhatch would, if that were the cause of the problem) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keeping Up Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Good point about the prop throwing water into the compartment - that could of course make it fill up above the outside water level. Of course if there was a vent above the (stern-depressed) outside water level, it would exit the compartment and the boat might still stay afloat. I've found that I can actually travel perfectly happily with my weedhatch removed, because the propeller is situated a few inches astern of the hatch. But of course if I go into reverse without the hatch in place, then I get a fountain - in fact the force of the water broke the bottom plate off my first weedhatch when I did an emergency stop (it made a heck of a clang in the propeller blades!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doorman Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Good point about the prop throwing water into the compartment - that could of course make it fill up above the outside water level. Of course if there was a vent above the (stern-depressed) outside water level, it would exit the compartment and the boat might still stay afloat. I've found that I can actually travel perfectly happily with my weedhatch removed, because the propeller is situated a few inches astern of the hatch. But of course if I go into reverse without the hatch in place, then I get a fountain - in fact the force of the water broke the bottom plate off my first weedhatch when I did an emergency stop (it made a heck of a clang in the propeller blades!) Sounds like a course in Gynecology is required to clear your prop from any debris! Did someone sack the welder after the bottom plate incident? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keeping Up Posted October 15, 2010 Report Share Posted October 15, 2010 Sounds like a course in Gynecology is required to clear your prop from any debris! Did someone sack the welder after the bottom plate incident? Luckily as it's a cruiser stern, access to the weedhatch is very good so it isn't too difficult. On the up-side, access is very good for clearing debris that has wound itself around the shaft in front of the prop It was more the poor design than the quality of the welding which caused the bottom plate to break off. The boat-builder paid for a local company to redesign and replace it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doorman Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 Assuming that this sorry incident occurred due to the weed hatch either not being replaced, or, being replaced incorrectly, would it not be prudent for boat builders, to install a safety interlock switch that would be wired in series with the ignition key or starter button? This simple but effective device would inhibit the the engine from being started, if the weed hatch is not in place or fitted incorrectly. A warning light on the control panel would indicate why the engine has been 'locked-out'. It would definitely be a cheaper option than a full re-fit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keble Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 The boat is now floating - piccy taken yesterday at Glos docks. Looks a bit damaged at the bow but probably repairable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canaldrifter Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 I've found that I can actually travel perfectly happily with my weedhatch removed, because the propeller is situated a few inches astern of the hatch. But of course if I go into reverse without the hatch in place, then I get a fountain - in fact the force of the water broke the bottom plate off my first weedhatch when I did an emergency stop (it made a heck of a clang in the propeller blades!) I think you mean 'with the weed hatch cover removed', but why would you want to even start the engine with the cover off? Tone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heffalump Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Curiosity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canaldrifter Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 .... killed the cat. Tone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Dowson Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Its too dangerous this boating lark, I'm going back to hang-gliding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keeping Up Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 I think you mean 'with the weed hatch cover removed', but why would you want to even start the engine with the cover off? Tone Yes OK, the cover (top plate with now-stronger down-brackets and a bottom plate) was removed. I originally did it because I was trying to get a clue as to whether or not my prop-singing was affected by its proximity to the lower plate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canaldrifter Posted November 28, 2010 Report Share Posted November 28, 2010 Yes OK, the cover (top plate with now-stronger down-brackets and a bottom plate) was removed. I originally did it because I was trying to get a clue as to whether or not my prop-singing was affected by its proximity to the lower plate. Aah.... research purposes. Covers a multitude of sins. Was it? Tone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titan Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Perhaps a little premature as ive not as yet handed over the money, but i think as at present i am going to be the new owner of this boat, i will gratefully receive any fitting out advice any one has, initially it will be a deep clean and remove inner surface rust and painting of the inner, to make good, also the lifting and replacing of the perkins engine, may decide to rebuild?? depends on how far its, gone? so offers of engines also welcomed, this will be a long and trying project, but for some the only realistic chance of enjoying canal life kind regards Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotEver Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 No advice, Martin, just warm wishes of good luck in this venture It's good to know she'll live again. Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebrof Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 If you're right, Drifter, it makes rather a mockery of some people's obsession with hull thicknesses and overplating. Well, you could say that because of that focus on sound hulls, no boats have sunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotEver Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Well, you could say that because of that focus on sound hulls, no boats have sunk. 12 months later, I doubt Athy even remembers posting that T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebrof Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 12 months later, I doubt Athy even remembers posting that T. Tony, you do a very decent job of following me around and pointing out my errors, and generally cleaning up after me. Rather like a dung beetle, in fact. Keep at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotEver Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Tony, you do a very decent job of following me around and pointing out my errors... Thank you for the compliment, but I'm a bit lost. What errors? Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titan Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 No advice, Martin, just warm wishes of good luck in this venture It's good to know she'll live again. Tony Thankyou for your sentiments, i will try and do her justice, it goes without saying i do feel so sorry for the previous owners who lost so much when it sank, however im led to believe they had swiftly moved on to another newer boat and all is well and i wish them a trouble free life afloat, as for me lol, keep the faith?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WotEver Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 ... as for me lol, keep the faith?? Absolutely! And ask away when you have any specific queries. In fact, I'd suggest you re-ask your question from a couple of posts back (deep clean etc) in a new thread in "Boat Building and Maintenance". It's likely to get a better response there. As I said, good luck Tony Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now