Chris-B

we have 6years currently on veto ( 1895) need to get one this year on Hare ( 1926) then every 6 after that Insurance and Risk Claims management ( IRCM ) Chris . . . . PS no penalty for a composting toilet LOL

I have a degree in dealing with shit ...full stop

LOL Mike ... Wine time as not long back from Italy Compost it works well for Lise and I mate ..... not saying its 100% and for everyone BUT it is another option It ( unlike cassette or pumpout) does require a degree of management

Starry, this was purchased last year from his wife .. IF and that is typed in large bold font we had any inkling of this it would have affected our purchasing decision on moral grounds My comment at mrsmelly was compost related and nowt else,,,,,,,, and on that note it's wine o'clock

Sometimes you can be a total twat , we have one and are happy with it different folks like different thing ....maybe you will enjoy the outer rings of Saturn ...;-)

Tug No2) is now sold , but as to what the new owner is doing I have no idea It is still currently at Pyrford but moving off at the end of the month

The froohles are strange on the other dimension and their cheese tastes like ravioli Ahh gearboxes not I have my inverted triple language keyboard I can see it was a one fifty back to the Gin then Toodle pip

I have eaten cheese Ignore me for 3 par secs whilst I go through the diamodora galaxy

More than likely it will be a prm 260 model @ 2:1 reduction ..... thats the norm

Get back in ya tree norty minkey

Yeah have emailed him Mark

Finished and re hung

Oh I can think of several ways to stop that LOL and YES I do ...... Still someone with deeper pockets than me got that one

Well it wasn't me as I took a kicking on the one bit I wanted

Nigel Without wishing to get into a long and protracted discussion where two parties have differing views I would like to make a couple of points 1. The use of Rye Harbour / Anglia and Medway are fairly irrelevant as they are not mainstream waterways 2. The disparity on licencing costs I agree will have to be a mediated and balanced settlement but why should the owner of a pair of boats pay 2 x that of an equivalent wide beam When the current licencing policy was introduced there were not the nuber of wider than narrow craft on the water than now , so a fair and balanced solution is to find a balance point between revenue and style of boat The EA (THames) policy is in my opinion a fair one but those who own widebeams will say its unfair No win win here for anyone as we will end up paying more to whichever licencing authority we are bound to Chris

Hahaha Mark .. nowt wrong with chip burners..... and ok Pete I will hold off a bit longer for the form though c

LOL no probs .. be more than happy to have you as a guest .....

I need to get the form in before the 15th March Pete so a decision by the 12th would work for me C

Pete I am going and if you would like to be my guest I would be more than happy Chris]

Probably the best thread on CWDF

Now sold

Greenie No 2 awarded

A can of worms indeed Tim.. and no matter what they decided there will always be winners and loosers They do need to get their act together and a unilateral licencing system needs to be found

Have a greenie Ray