wharfinger Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 to jame vassel working ok get in tutch bruce ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
journeyperson Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 (edited) to jame vassel working ok get in tutch bruce ] edited because the link below is more intriguing. Edited October 16, 2010 by journeyperson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 Perhaps this thread is something to do with it? Clicky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLWP Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 Hang on, I think I've solved it: YOutube Richard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timleech Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 (edited) edited because the link below is more intriguing. Shame, I'd guessed what he was on about but your first answer was more fun Tim Edit to add "VASSAL Built 1938 by James Pollock Sons & Co Ltd., Faversham. YN 1684. L38.2'. B10.5'. D4'. 13grt. 60bhp 2cyl Widdop diesel engine. ON165519. 1938 Delivered to Vokins & Co Ltd., London. 1975 Sold to Thames & General Lighterage Ltd., London. 1980 Acquired by Cory Lighterage Ltd., London. [Not operated] 198? Sold to Darling Brothers Ltd., London. 1982 Sold to General Marine Services, London, renamed Vassel. No further trace." from http://www.lighteragetugs.co.uk/ Edited October 16, 2010 by Timleech Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
journeyperson Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 Shame, I'd guessed what he was on about but your first answer was more fun It seemed a bit insensitive when someone is trying to pursue a serious boaty matter. Mind you, his postcode is in his details if you think my theory was right - and more fun . A lovely looking boat in its original incarnation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 From: The Liquid Highway... She's a lot sexier without the wheelhouse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Pink Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 She's a lot sexier without the wheelhouse. I imagine that's exactly what the helmsman would think when it's pissing down in a brisk January northeaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 I imagine that's exactly what the helmsman would think when it's pissing down in a brisk January northeaster. and yet, so many are content to trundle down the cut, for pleasure, in all weathers, without the aesthetically challenged benefit of a pram hood. The debate wages on, in my house, about whether the lifeboat should lose the wheelhouse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luctor et emergo Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 and yet, so many are content to trundle down the cut, for pleasure, in all weathers, without the aesthetically challenged benefit of a pram hood. The debate wages on, in my house, about whether the lifeboat should lose the wheelhouse. For once, I'm not sure, If you are serious, or being sarcastic... I can not see you taking the saw to your lifeboat... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luctor et emergo Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 Mind you, if she would have had a 'Josher' bow, the discussion would probably have stretched to three pages by now.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 I can not see you taking the saw to your lifeboat... The wheelhouse has to go. It's just too ugly. The question is, does it get a new, nicer wheelhouse or back to the original shelter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luctor et emergo Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 Ohh, I see. is that an original picture? That certainly chances matters. Is that a steam funnel? Does all of the wheel house have to go? I kinda like the forward part of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek R. Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 H/T to Carl for those links. This one is superb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timleech Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 and yet, so many are content to trundle down the cut, for pleasure, in all weathers, without the aesthetically challenged benefit of a pram hood. The debate wages on, in my house, about whether the lifeboat should lose the wheelhouse. Narrow Boats, with a proper back cabin and stove, do give enough protection to make boating tolerable in most weathers at least in their native sheltered waters. My little tug (slightly smaller than the Vassal, but from the same yard) had no steerer protection according to the original plans, but a folding windscreen (a bit like a 1930s sports car) appears on early pictures. Having gone down the Ship Canal this Easter, in a very cold (literal) gale with spray breaking over the top of the wheelbox I wouldn't consider going back to those days, even if it did look 'better'. In fact I aim to add some sort of heating in due course The challenge is to redesign the wheelbox so that it can be collapsed in some way but not get in the way while collapsed, at the same time giving a bit more headroom for the steerer as the present fixed structure was designed to clear the fixed bridges on the Trent Navigation in Nottingham. (Hopefully Speedwheel doesn't mind me using his pic) Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Pink Posted October 17, 2010 Report Share Posted October 17, 2010 (edited) The wheelhouse has to go. It's just too ugly. The question is, does it get a new, nicer wheelhouse or back to the original shelter? Men was men in them days. much more importantly, are you going to put the sails back? Edited October 17, 2010 by Chris Pink Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now