This is quite correct. The net result of these agreements is that it either doesn't get done or it costs a fortune. BW will not undertake to do the work themselves, even at your expense- they haven't got the tackle , they sold the last of it off last week in that auction. Their approved contractors are big time operators , there are about 3 of them nationally and are unlikely to be bothered to turn out for what would be a small job to them. The only chance there would be if they were dredging that particular canal anyway and you could get it done as an add-on.
If you could jump through all the hurdles and DIY officially, there are all sorts of practical problems........
You would have to get the silt you propose to remove analyzed for contamination first. Disposal of the dredgings costs more depending on the nature and level of contamination- less of a problem in a rural area , but tests still need to be done . Permission or a license from the EA will be needed to dump the spoil even on the farmer's own land .
The depth to which the canal is dredged is also problematical, many canals were built shallow at the sides, particularly the off towpath side , saucer shape , so to get moorings deep enough you need to dig out the clay bed - not always a good idea , but sometimes the canal was built through existing clay anyway and digging some of this out would be acceptable(BW might not agree with that!). Also, you need to consider the effect of deepening the canal on the piling/bank protection (if there is any) will that need upgrading?
As a final point, land based dredging will make a real mess of the bank & moorings , a floating dredger will not. You need to consider that before you engage Mick & Paddy.
Unofficially, has the JCB got working floodlights fitted?
Bill