OK, OK, I know I said I would never look at the "Dark Side"!
But am I the only one who finds the curious juxtaposition of those articles by the likes of Allan Richards versus Victor's more extreme rants more than distinctly odd?
On the one hand we get articles that quite rightly set out that CRT has embarked on a policy to try and get something in place, whilst totally failing to prove that the need for it exists. We are told in one article that NABO are against it, and in others that boaters are using the media to get their case over, and an article about Jenlyn's petition seemed to me to be pretty reasonable.
Now we get this.
containing gems like this.....
.....which to me seems to be a direct swipe at Steve "Jenlyn". No doubt in his next article "Victor" will provide his evidence that Steve is an "illegal moorer" - oh hang on though, perhaps he will not!
This stuff makes me very angry indeed, though I have no idea why I should get wound up my someone so narrow-minded and ill informed, I'm afraid I still do. I suppose it is because loads of people will lap up his words, and say "I'll have some more of that please!"
I am by most live-aboard's estimation a "shiny leisure boater", with boats kept on home moorings. When I do boat them, I boat them on the whole quite rapidly around the system, seldom even laying over for a day anywhere. That still doesn't stop me being wholly opposed to what CRT are trying to now bring in as a Visitor Moorings policy. We have pretty conclusively proved that BW and CRT have no data that supports the need to make the changes they are proposing, and a fair bit of evidence that their reasons for trying to do it are not the ones stated. It looks to me increasingly like a cynical attempt to sweep in a series of measures that effectively are trying to do a type of "social cleansing", by a completely heavy handed "sledge-hammer to crack a nut" method that will adversely affect "law abiding" boaters, whilst the relative few that choose not to be will continue to just stick two fingers up, and carry on.
Please nobody accept "Victor's" drivel without spending some time acquainting yourself with the research that a lot of us have worked hard on. Because that is just what it is - drivel!