The more I research this and read what other people are saying about the make up of the council,the more I feel that for boaters it is just tokenism. So boaters get 5 members and the blurb says this number was thought to be fair as boaters contribute about 20% of the funds to CaRT and 5 seats represents 20% of the seats. So I guess the conclusion from this is the other 30 seats represent 80% of the funds. Now we all know that the other 80% contribute very little financially so when the Council discusses such things as where money should be spent 80% of the members will be deciding based on the fact that they contribute very little financially. Now I know that restoration groups do contribute financially to their own projects but this money is not available for the complete system.
I am trying to remain positive about CaRT but I think the make up of the Council is just another example of how the process is flawed. In the excitement of the fact that we are going to have a voice on the Council we seem to be overlooking that our voice in comparison to future funding is just completely inadequate.