I guess Daniel and his team are somewhat hampered by their confidentiality around discussing individual mod actions.
So what is left behind is that they can't discuss the detail of individual mod actions or decisions. They can only discuss moderation in general terms
Without the truth of decisions being in the open, and rightly so in my opinion, discussions about moderation on the open forum are open to assumption, speculation, and distortion by people who have agendas of their own to pursue.
So forum members are free to assume, speculate, and distort, at will - but the mods have their hands tied behind their backs.
However forum members from here are completely free to discuss mod decisions from here, over on Thunderboat. Ask yourself how often those reports back to Thunderboat are given with total honesty. Are those reports slanted, altered, distorted, to favour the person reporting back? You bet your sweet life they are!
Hardly fair is it