Saw this on Cart's facebook page
"And they're off"
Peter Ponting
.
Make things simple and effective.
Having read the SE proposals and followed (and contributed) to the debates about moorings. Perhaps it is time for CaRT to listen to common sense and a productive way of solving issues.
Visitor Moorings are what they say. For Visitors. These are usually found near Towns, villages etc, where visitors can explore the areas. These can easily be monitored, either by CaRT representatives or volunteers living near the moorings. These should all be made 48 hour moorings, to enable visitors to visit the areas. That should be the main priority, ensuring that no boat stays longer than 48 hours. This enables towns and villages a continuous supply of new people, all using local stores to "top up"
Next we have the 7 - 14 day moorings, which should be further away than visitors moorings, as they have more time to explore the areas. These could be checked on a weekly basis.
The License system is flawed in so much that boats in marina's use the system as and when they can, which usually mean weekend's. So apart from using marina facilities, they use very little else on the system. To which they pay a premium (mooring fees)
Likewise, boats moored on private land adjacent to the towpath also have to pay mooring fees, some with facilities, others without. But they use the facilities provided by CaRT probably more than a marina based boat.
Hire boat companies use very little facilities except for water and rubbish disposal.
Live aboards with no moorings probably use the facilities most.
In conclusion,
Scrap the continuous cruising license, as they use more facilities than anybody else.
Limit mooring times to 48 hours and 7 -14 days.
This will increase efficiency and reduce the problems which are occurring everyday and easily monitored.
https://www.facebook.com/#!/canalrivertrustboating?fref=ts