MtB Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 No need to shout! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exfire Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 oops sorry must have hit the font size :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtB Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 You've set my tinitus off again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tam & Di Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) disbenefit-----------disadvantage,impediment,setback,hinderance,negative item, Ah, but FadetoScarlet wrote dis benefit, and Di was wondering what that benefit might be (plus noting a missing possessive apostrophe) Tam Edited July 9, 2015 by Tam & Di Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Clinton Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 I'm struggling to see why anyone would ever give one up - surely if you wanted to move your boat away, you would try to acquire another cheap boat, put it on the mooring, then quicklky resell it for far more, but with the mooring rights? Maybe not everyone's greedy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtB Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 Maybe not everyone's greedy? True. Some people have more money than sense and don't need to husband their assets carefully. Other people need to be very careful with their money. I don't see what Alan is suggesting as greed, any more than cleaning up and painting your boat to maximise the sale price could be classed as greed . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Athy Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 Ah, but FadetoScarlet wrote dis benefit, and Di was wondering what that benefit might be Tam Surely "dat benefit"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FadeToScarlet Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 (edited) Ah, but FadetoScarlet wrote dis benefit, and Di was wondering what that benefit might be (plus noting a missing possessive apostrophe) Tam I wrote disbenefit, but the iPad autocorrected it. I can't see a missing apostrophe though Edited July 9, 2015 by FadeToScarlet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtB Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 I wrote disbenefit, but the iPad autocorrected it. I can't see a missing apostrophe though I can't see the missing apostrophe either. Damned autokorreckt. I didn't realise "dis" was a word either! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalky Posted July 9, 2015 Report Share Posted July 9, 2015 A colleague of mine is working with one of the research groups and is staying in halls. Like you he's been quoted £5K and considers it to be worth paying for the stress that it avoids. Means he can spend more time in the pub studying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samuelthomson Posted July 10, 2015 Author Report Share Posted July 10, 2015 Hi, thanks for all the thoughts on this! Listening to other peoples' experience/reckoning is very helpful, especially FadeToScralet, fittie et al. I'm most convinced by the added-stress argument that it wouldn't be a good idea. It sounds like permanent mooring probably wouldn't be cheaper, and if CCing, I'd likely be spending a day a week moving/getting gas/changing batteries/retrieving post etc for a saving equivalent to working in a bar every Thursday (which might admittedly be less spiritually fortifying). My college hasn't been able to offer anything affordable, but I've seen a few rooms on Gumtree that would cost less than a permanent-mooring. For some reason, the University under-supplies on accommodation while requiring students to have a permanent address in the local area. Now you know where our housing policy comes from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark99 Posted July 10, 2015 Report Share Posted July 10, 2015 (edited) I think you have made the right decision. After all perhaps (and maybe this is harsh) you were not actually here to enjoy the canals/waterways; you wanted to seek to do the minimum to enable you to live and study whilst using the place/boat as a cheaper form of accommodation. Those days seem to be ending with enforcement on the rise. Unfortunately a sad state of the UK accommodation market perhaps. Edited July 10, 2015 by mark99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MtB Posted July 10, 2015 Report Share Posted July 10, 2015 It sounds like permanent mooring probably wouldn't be cheaper, and if CCing, I'd likely be spending a day a week moving/getting gas/changing batteries/retrieving post etc for a saving equivalent to working in a bar every Thursday (which might admittedly be less spiritually fortifying). Taken literally, I think working in a bar could easily turn out to be more spiritually fortifying... Cheese! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now