there is parellel here with a church building in addleston (hang in with me). The people in the street complained because the 'institution' sold the church in their street. They were up in arms not only because the building was to close, but that it would become a centre for islam. The vicar said it was built as a place of worship and should remain thus. The locals didn't agree, and were fed up (to put it politel)y that there would be an increase in traffic. The minister did point out that no-one from that street (the street who complained, the street for whom that church was local) went to the church. Therefore, if the locals wanted the church, if they wanted it to be a part of their community they should have supported it. Seems to me, with castle mill, the locals want it - do they support it. If they do, and if others do, then it should remain.
Its all to easy to sell somewhere for the money it will bring in for flats, but surely none of us support that? We are into community, into support, and if anywhere is an important part of community it should be maintained. Whether we have visited or not, whether it is a mess or not, surely its about maintaining our history, and our community. Sure, it might have been difficult finding someone to take it over - but they did, and they are there. Offering any citizen enormous amounts of money is tempting - is that what BW will do? Then thats what they will do. We still have to fight for a right, for our heritage, but we have to accept if it goes, it has to go for the right price, and sure, we'll suffer, but lets then buy it for the price BW offer the current owner, if we can't, we are in his position and of course we would take the money. Thats why today, we have to support all that we stand for, whether we like it or not whether its cheaper elsewhere. Sounds like the village shop scenario to me - people want the shop, but they prefer to shop in the supermarket...
more wine anyone?