I have been reading the various threads regarding mooring, costs, and licences with great interest.
One thing that this system of 'auctioning off' moorings will achive, is that it will price a lot people out off the market, and stop them from getting a boat altogether. Regardless of the canals (presumed) being full, if you lose a certain amount of 'new boaters' coming into the system, you will end up with less boaters, who will spend less money. Second hand values will drop, because those with enough money will buy new boats, but there will not be enough buyers for their old craft.
With the economy nowhere near out of the doldrums (and perhaps only being on a short term respite..! ) I would think that leisure boating will take a knock. Foreign holidays and flying already have. It would be interesting to see data relating to the hire boat industry, and perhaps the amount of fuel sold to boats (as that would give a fair indication of how much people actually took their boats out). Has there been an increase of boats for sale (indicating more people getting out of boating)? How many people on Permanent or Residential Mooring waiting lists are actually still looking to take up a space, if it became available?
I think that it would be a good idea if BW would make living on the canal ('legaly') easier, to encourage more people onto the canal. It would increase their revenue, and would help the various businesses like marinas and chandlers too.
If it would be un-neccessary to 'bridge hop' it would probably be much less of a problem. It should be possible than, to effectivly enforce the rules, rather than to 'turn a blind eye', which encourages the current practice of 'bridge hopping'.
I, for example, would rather pay 'rent' to live on my own boat, than pay the equivalent rent to a land lord to live in a one bed flat or such.
And yes, it is patently obvious that BW are keeping the price of moorings up, by only auctioning them off one at a time.... supply and demand.