Alastair Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 I wondered what BW's actual purpose/charter is. So I looked it up, on the DEFRA website. BW charter on DEFRA There is nothing in it whatsoever about boats. We (boaters) are stuffed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 I wondered what BW's actual purpose/charter is. So I looked it up, on the DEFRA website. BW charter on DEFRA There is nothing in it whatsoever about boats. We (boaters) are stuffed. Not even a mention in 'Direct Customers'! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastair Posted October 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 I was (and am) gobsmacked. I was about to tackle them over the tender and eviction issues, on the basis that they weren't fulfilling their duty to their customers under their charter. Instead, I find out that we aren't customers under their charter. As I said, we are stuffed. They can do whatever they bl**dy well like to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 I was (and am) gobsmacked. I was about to tackle them over the tender and eviction issues, on the basis that they weren't fulfilling their duty to their customers under their charter. Instead, I find out that we aren't customers under their charter. As I said, we are stuffed. They can do whatever they bl**dy well like to us. But if they don't recognise boaters as customers, why are boaters giving them money? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick_B Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 ... or could it be that as there is no mention of boats they cannot tell you what to do at all. They have no jurisdiction? I know.... waffle!! But.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Fairhurst Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 There is nothing in it whatsoever about boats. But there is in the Framework Document: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/water/iw/frame/index.htm ...which is still, together with the Transport Act 1968, Government's formal instructions to BW as to how it should operate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaggle Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 one effective way to protest and get noticed is for boaters to open as many roadbridges as possible during the rush hours in all cities around the country , done on a preset day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machpoint005 Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 one effective way to protest and get noticed is for boaters to open as many roadbridges as possible during the rush hours in all cities around the country , done on a preset day. Why limit it to cities? there are rural ones that are partcularly good at 'catching' 4 by 4's - not that I'd ever condone such selfish action, of course... Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastair Posted October 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 But there is in the Framework Document: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/water/iw/frame/index.htm ...which is still, together with the Transport Act 1968, Government's formal instructions to BW as to how it should operate. Thanks for the link. There are, however, only two direction items of relevance: "British Waterways should encourage adjoining landowners and authorities to participate in jointly enhancing value by the regeneration and provision of facilities that are to the benefit of the general public and that improve the tourism, recreational, amenity and community value of the waterways for boaters, anglers, walkers and cyclists." And "British Waterways should continue to encourage the development of off-line moorings" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy-Neil Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 (edited) one effective way to protest and get noticed is for boaters to open as many roadbridges as possible during the rush hours in all cities around the country , done on a preset day. Some of the busiest opening bridges have time lock on them preventing their use in the rush hour..... I feel such a protest is likely to provoke an increase in their number..... Edited October 15, 2007 by Hairy-Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denboy Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 lets have a national blokade of strategic places and invite the press to attend im sure they would not enjoy the bad publicity Im up for it whos going to join me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fender Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 BW wont give a fig if there's protests on the canal - best picket their headquarters and regional offices - or protest outside the homes of their directors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Fairhurst Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 one effective way to protest and get noticed is for boaters to open as many roadbridges as possible during the rush hours in all cities around the country , done on a preset day. I've long thought the best place to protest would be by draping a banner along the side of your boat while mooring it on the aqueduct which takes the Tame Valley Canal over the M5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fender Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 I've long thought the best place to protest would be by draping a banner along the side of your boat while mooring it on the aqueduct which takes the Tame Valley Canal over the M5. dear richard, a rather tame way of protestation if I may say better to drape said banner on the aqueduct itself! and theres the one in Milton keynes - a massive protest banner potential! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Fairhurst Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Oh, sure. But the Highways Agency or BW could quite easily remove your banner if it were on their property (the aqueduct). I don't see what they could do if the banner was on your boat - there's no bylaw saying "thou shalt not have words criticising the Government written on your boat"! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alistair Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 there's no bylaw saying "thou shalt not have words criticising the Government written on your boat"! Ssssh. You'll be giving them ideas... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil.A Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 lets have a national blokade of strategic places and invite the press to attend im sure they would not enjoy the bad publicity Im up for it whos going to join me Me, the rest down here and Sawley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LisaG1 Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Most definatley, we're up for anything to get back at BW. Lisa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Orentas Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Probably the most effective thing you could do would be simple non-compliance. Remember BW are not the owners of the canals or anything else, they are no more than employees of the government who have been contracted to maintain and generally care for the waterways. No one has given them permission to embark on the road of property development and speculation with your money, why should they be building office blocks many miles from the nearest canal.. Pubs do you really want them to be buying or creating a chain of pubs with your cash, apart from anything else do you think they would be any good at it, much more likely it will be a financial disaster with massive losses suitably diluted in the general accounts and again they will blame the workers on the bank and you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StoneHenge Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 and thus our license fees will increase...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastair Posted October 17, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 No one has given them permission to embark on the road of property development and speculation with your money, why should they be building office blocks many miles from the nearest canal.. If you read the DEFRA charter handed to BW, you will see that BW are required to do this. However, they aren't required to do anything for boaters. That's what I was so gobsmacked about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carlt Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 and thus our license fees will increase...... Let's not bother then eh? Didn't your licence increase last year? Won't it increase next year? If that was everyone's attitude I'd have a vote and you wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy-Neil Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 - there's no bylaw saying "thou shalt not have words criticising the Government written on your boat"! I can't speak for BW but there certainly is one on the Thames.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now