Jump to content

baz gimson

Member
  • Posts

    122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by baz gimson

  1. No it was a policy decision by the Thatcher government to make the legal system more open to those without the finance to bring claims.....the law of unintended consequences etc But you knew that already.......because a free market in any service is a desirable outcome....
  2. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  3. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  4. so...you say that the judges have their own angle on the case which reinforces the EA case rather than the opposition...that implies that they are supporting the state organisations position...which as you have posted before is the default position of the courts...I E the judiciary supports the state and legitimises its actions
  5. So after all that waffle ....what did the judges decide???? as organs of the state I would expect them to uphold the existing order...but I can't divine that from your post
  6. Lister ST workshop manual http://winget.co.uk/document/LISTER%20ST%20WORKSHOP%20MANUAL.pdf
  7. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  8. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  9. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  10. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  11. Fascinating article. I now realise that it was Keith that I met at Welford in the early 90's. He was telling me about his Indian built engines that he was importing and selling And showed me the one in his boat. I think it was some sort of open day/festival at the basin .
  12. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  13. You could ask this question on the London Boaters Facebook group
  14. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  15. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  16. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  17. dont fancy that billy boy then try the real swedes http://www.hautaterva.net/
  18. screwfix sell it........ http://www.screwfix.com/p/battles-stockholm-tar-1kg/8476G?kpid=8476G&cm_mmc=Google-_-Product%20Listing%20Ads-_-Sales%20Tracking-_-sales%20tracking%20url&gclid=CN7eqobdgs8CFasp0wodvmwGQw
  19. recently bought a Samsung J5 after the second hand Samsung S4 developed problems......very happy with it...i run a sim only EE deal
  20. so that's what it is....cheers. Interesting background info too. edit...this looks like it..last three digits of reg number match the ones visible in the pics online Ruffian Built by Unknown - Length : 12.8 metres ( 42 feet ) - Beam : 2.75 metres ( 9 feet ) - Draft : 1.37 metres ( 4 feet 6 inches ). Metal hull N/A . Registered with Canal & River Trust number 509843 as an Unpowered Unpowered Craft. ( Last updated on Wednesday 22nd May 2013 ) cheers...that's it....got the same fore and aft bollard mounted vises....... definitely the same one
  21. the crane company lost the hire fee and had to pay the floor gang and the transport firm carrying the floors.....it was their responsibility to ensure they could do the job....not ours. eveyrthing you list to check is the crane companies job...they contract to do the lift and take responsibility if it goes wrong...not us.
  22. It depends....we used a firm like that once...they turned up and discovered that there wasn't room to put the outriggers to the full length, they went away and so did the lorry with the concrete floors and the gang who were laying them.....an expensive mistake on their part. Dewsbury and Proud sent a guy out to look at the site and see where the crane could fit.....the lift wasn't that heavy but the reach and height required an 80 ton crane.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.