Troyboy Posted August 27, 2016 Report Posted August 27, 2016 Do you have a part no. for the 'Diesel' pulley ? The part number for a BMC 1.5 diesel pulley is 12H 253 or 12H 1460 according to the BMC parts book I've got .Both numbers are listed as alternatives.
ditchy Posted August 29, 2016 Author Report Posted August 29, 2016 Did you find one? I had to use calcutt in the end and that was for one off of another engine. All up and running again now.
DHutch Posted August 30, 2016 Report Posted August 30, 2016 If that isn't the most helpful post I've ever seen, I don't remember what the better ones were! I don't have a BMC engine, but I might go and buy one just to ask questions about it now! Nice one, Richard, have a greenie. Indeed.
Chalky Posted August 30, 2016 Report Posted August 30, 2016 I've just bought a spare pulley for my MG ( plan to fit a trigger wheel to it ). When it arrives I'll measure it and post the dimensions in case someone else needs a replacement.
Tony Brooks Posted August 31, 2016 Report Posted August 31, 2016 (edited) I've just bought a spare pulley for my MG ( plan to fit a trigger wheel to it ). When it arrives I'll measure it and post the dimensions in case someone else needs a replacement. But how are you going to test the frequency of torsional oscillation the rubber member is designed to damp? I know that if its is not correct it can snap the crankshaft and the MG has a petrol engine not diesel so the frequency MIGHT be different. I would say part numbers or input from whoever designed them is the only way to really know if they will do the job. I am not saying there is a difference or even if there is that difference would snap a crank but is it worth the risk? Richard has shown how the split boss can be overcome. Edited August 31, 2016 by Tony Brooks
DHutch Posted August 31, 2016 Report Posted August 31, 2016 If its running at the same speed, with the same no of cylinders, the firing frequency will of cause be the same. A petrol engine will also have a less harsh firing force, however, if its designed to have a damper removing it is obviously always a risk to an extent. Daniel
Tony Brooks Posted September 1, 2016 Report Posted September 1, 2016 And compression forces, I agree the frequency will be the same but I am just not so sure about the forces.
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now