I wasn't looking to get into an argument, but I'll try to explain my view once more.
There are I think we can agree , those few who would seek to stay in one place permanently for their own reasons.
If the navigation authority makes permanent changes (at times of drought movement requirement are suspended) some of this few would seek to use this to excuse their own desire not to move, and perhaps improvise on it (its too rainy to move, it's too hot to move, etc.)
If I go through locks on my journey, I'm not wasting water, I'm using it to navigate which is the requirements of the navigation authority.
I've been travelling around since February this year and haven't yet encountered any restrictions to navigation on my chosen route, other than timings at locks, but since I generally wouldn't seek to traverse locks other than between 8am and 4pm, this hasn't been a meaningful restriction to me (I know, I'm lucky).
If I happened to be on the South Oxford at present (now Claydon is shut) I'd about turn, but using locks to leave isn't wasting water in my view.
On the Leeds & Liverpool I think you're blocked in the pound you're in , so travel is impossible but so is enforcement whilst the locks are closed ... therefore no changes are required to the 14 days rule.
I'll keep moving whilst I can, and hope that you can too ... I was merely agreeing that permanent changes to the 14 day rule aren't necessary ... the drought is short term, the potential adverse effects of rule changes could be long term as there are those that would seek to use it as a precedent going forward.
Now where's that windlass, I've got Cheshire locks to do next 😊
Rog