Jump to content

Paul C

Member
  • Posts

    11,910
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Paul C

  1. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  2. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  3. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  4. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  5. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  6. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  7. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  8. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  9. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  10. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  11. Anyone trying to claim it for a boat over about 2.7 tons would face an uphill struggle, since the maximum gross weight of a trailer with overrun brakes, towed by any car, is 3.5 tons (allowing for the weight of the trailer itself). To tow over 3.5t, you'd need to have at least C1+E licence (with no 107 endorsement) then your GCW can be 12t - so "about" 6 tons max towing (MAM of trailer can't exceed MAM of truck). You could squeak a 7.5t without O licence for private use only. Anything more than 6t towing, you're into C+E licences and O licence required.
  12. It depends how you define the colloquial term of "ghost mooring". The above scenario could be two different things - with the distinction being critical. It could be an "unused" mooring but that exists, ie the farmer has space for 10 boats, has 10 moorers but one of them is never seen at that mooring. Or it could be what I'd call a "ghost mooring" in that the farmer still takes the money - perhaps a lower amount (or even none at all) - but that customer which never visits is the 11th (or 20th, or 200th). Of course, this would show up as a pattern in CRT's checks, since they check moored boats at online moorings and most marinas. It would show that 10 are predominantly occupying their mooring with occasional trips out, and the 11th is never there. So the claim of having a mooring there would be brought into question. The farmer may well say the boater moors there (in return for the money), and might even do it innocently, in some kind of multi-occupancy scheme where he maximises his business income. At the end of the day the law is written such that the boater needs to satisfy CRT, not the other way round. And never using a mooring is going to be something of a hurdle to cross if CRT have the sightings.
  13. Which case was this? Your thought process seems to be entrenched in the (bizarre IMHO) mindset of having a boat but not boating. Are you "bona fide" a boater? No need to answer, just something to think over before purchasing your boat.
  14. Ag tie = Agricultural Tie. (slang) One of the very few ways to build a house on agricultural land is to prove that accommodation is needed for a farm worker - for this, you would need a business plan showing that the land is capable of generating a net income (£26000 I believe). Of course, if the land IS capable of that, and its being done already, but there isn't a property there (ie whoever is farming it lives elsewhere, comes to work and does the work then goes home), that in itself doesn't prove the need for the occupation. But I suspect you either have an existing job/career, or you cannot prove you are going to farm the land. You forgot to mention the £/acre.......which is okay. I am guessing, that's the motivation of the landowner in selling the land to you, that he'll get £££ and you will have the PP issues not him. If it is in fact land which has a viable chance of getting PP for a change of use to housing, you'll be about 300th in the queue and he won't be looking at a rusty end-of-life boat being dragged onto it.
  15. As a wild guess, is this registered as agricultural land? And if so, how much (ie area and £ price)? There's a route with an ag tie but its going to need MUCH more evidence than I think you have - for example, it would need to be a big area and you'd need to demonstrate a viable business plan and the need for a permanent dwelling there. If its just a case of its ag land but he's offering it on the downlow, then you're going to be limited to 28 days/year use.
  16. One of these is a far more sensible idea, and I can't see a narrowboat being treated differently than this, for PP etc:
  17. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  18. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  19. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  20. HGV medical is about £40 from specialist suppliers; from your own GP it can be frighteningly expensive! I don't know if its the same as the "retain D1/C1 entitlement at 70+" but it probably is.
  21. When were you able to drive a minibus (for hire/reward) on a "standard driving licence" - and how are you defining a "standard driving licence" anyway? I passed my test in 1997 and have D1 with 101 endorsement - 101 meaning "not for hire or reward". If anyone in a similar situation DID want to drive for hire/reward they would need to take a driving test in a minibus to remove the endorsement. This would clearly come under hire/reward, thus you'd have legally needed to take a driving test to remove the 101 endorsement if you had it. Or are you saying you had a D1 with no endorsement before? needs D1 licence can be driven on B licence Since they are effectively the same with no passengers on board, makes sense the minibus can be driven without further test.
  22. This post cannot be displayed because it is in a forum which requires at least 10 posts to view.
  23. There's varying levels of sophistication: 1. Tether from your existing phone. Can be good (if your phone is 5G, for example). Sometimes rubbish due to being inside the boat (you'd not leave your phone on the roof, right?) £0 2. Mifi unit hung in a window ~£25 3. Mifi unit with external aerial ~£50 4. "posh/expensive" mifi £50+ Since (1) can often achieve the speeds of (4), it is worth trying (1) first. It is ALL about location when your on the edge of decent mobile phone coverage, which you will often be on canals (but might not be if your stationary at one particular marina).
  24. Efficiency =/= fuel flowrate though. Its less efficient at idle, but because its turning slower, the fuel consumption is less. And........it depends how "efficiency" is defined. A canal boat engine is effectively a CHP plant, there's 3 services which it can provide: heat, electrical power (via the alternator), propulsion.
  25. Its best to think of load, not simply revs. True, when there's no other loads on the engine and its simply used to propel the boat, there is a clear relationship between load and revs. But when in neutral and spinning an alternator charging batteries at full power, most of the load is due to having to turn the alternator....which varies with revs too, but peaks at around 1200rpm. There will be a proportion of load which still relates to engine revs (for example frictional losses, water pump, pumping losses of the engine itself) but its not the full picture.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.