canal boat man Posted May 17, 2008 Report Share Posted May 17, 2008 does anybody know the air draft in harecastle tunnel. i have tried to measure my 4year old narrowboat from the waterline to the highest point, in my case, with chimney and wind generator discounted a mushroom vent, this measures about 6' 3'' or 75 inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NB Phoenix Posted May 17, 2008 Report Share Posted May 17, 2008 does anybody know the air draft in harecastle tunnel. i have tried to measure my 4year old narrowboat from the waterline to the highest point, in my case, with chimney and wind generator discounted a mushroom vent, this measures about 6' 3'' or 75 inches. Harecastle Tunnel headroom 5ft 9in (1.74m) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickhlx Posted May 17, 2008 Report Share Posted May 17, 2008 Harecastle Tunnel headroom 5ft 9in (1.74m) you'll have to let the tyre down a bit then !! Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Orentas Posted May 18, 2008 Report Share Posted May 18, 2008 The air draft dimensions are published all over the place all with minor variations, but I would certainly say that any sensible size narrowboat would not have any kind of problems in the Harecastle.. Even in the early days of the 1970's when much of the towpath was still in place and the tunnel roof dipped alarmingly in places I never knew of any boats not making the passage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_fincher Posted May 18, 2008 Report Share Posted May 18, 2008 (edited) I'll admit I've not been through for (very) many years. But I'm over 6 foot, and stood on a cruiser stern I'm damn sure that at no point did I have to duck as much as a figure of 5 foot 9 inches implies. I think that figure must include a very hefty margin of error! Alan Edited May 18, 2008 by alan_fincher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Lewis Posted May 18, 2008 Report Share Posted May 18, 2008 (edited) I'll admit I've not been through for (very) many years. But I'm over 6 foot, and stood on a cruiser stern I'm damn sure that at no point did I have to duck as much as a figure of 5 foot 9 inches implies. I think that figure must include a very hefty margin of error! Alan Very much agree, the height in the centre must be at least 7'6". Obviously air draught should allow for the height out of water at the sides of the roof but as Harecastle was originally built with a towing path I would consider that the 5'9" figure to be well out. Tim Edited May 18, 2008 by Tim Lewis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timleech Posted May 18, 2008 Report Share Posted May 18, 2008 Very much agree, the height in the centre must be at least 7'6". Obvioslt airdrauught should allow for the height out of water at the sides of the roof but as Harecastle was originally built with a towing path I would consider that the 5'9" figure to be well out. Tim I brought an ex-BW dredger through last autumn. The tunnel keeper's first response was along the lines of 'you're not taking that thing through here, it'll never fit!'. A couple of phone calls established to his satisfaction that the same craft had already been through the tunnel, though he was still adamant that it had to clear the gauge before he would let us in. In fact one of the legs did just touch the gauge - would have missed if we'd been a few inches over to the other side - but we had ample clearance (albeit only inches in some parts) all the way through after resetting the back actor boom to be lower than its normal travelling position. If your handrails are close to the gauge you might have to accept losing some paint on the way through as being part of the experience. Not the lowest point, but close. Tim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertG Posted May 18, 2008 Report Share Posted May 18, 2008 I brought an ex-BW dredger through last autumn. The tunnel keeper's first response was along the lines of 'you're not taking that thing through here, it'll never fit!'. A couple of phone calls established to his satisfaction that the same craft had already been through the tunnel, though he was still adamant that it had to clear the gauge before he would let us in. In fact one of the legs did just touch the gauge - would have missed if we'd been a few inches over to the other side - but we had ample clearance (albeit only inches in some parts) all the way through after resetting the back actor boom to be lower than its normal travelling position. If your handrails are close to the gauge you might have to accept losing some paint on the way through as being part of the experience. Tim Perhaps someone could go through with an ultrasonic tape measure strapped to an upright? You'd probably want one person steering and the other taking readings: not sure I'd like to do both at once. You can get quite good ones for around a tenner from Deal Extreme (the world's most dangerous website - I have pals with serious £30 a month habits). In fact, if anyone's going to be in London and thence through the tunnel, and feels like doing it, I'd be happy to get one and lend it out for the cause in exchange for a beer. Any excuse to buy gadgets (and drink beer). Aaaaaactually, if I had my dream of a proper floating geekerie, I'd get one of these and have it logging automatically to the server. But then I'd have to build a rotating scan head to produce a tunnel profile - slip ring commutator or bluetooth data link? And then hook it into the autopilot to keep an optimum heading. Would have to build the autopilot first of course, but then that's higher on the list anyway as part of my ropeless mooring plan. Imagine if you could just park the boat a foot away from the bank and it would keep itself there without any physical connection - is that an actual mooring? What if you program the thing to inch forward a foot an hour? Puts a whole new light on continuous cruising. And mooring charges. Sorry. This isn't helping. Y'know, if I do get my watery Evil Scientist Stronghold (what am I saying. WHEN I do get...) I'll have to call it NB Drifting Topic. R (you should see the plans for the directed energy ned repeller - just waiting for this to hit the government surplus market) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canal boat man Posted May 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2008 I brought an ex-BW dredger through last autumn. The tunnel keeper's first response was along the lines of 'you're not taking that thing through here, it'll never fit!'. A couple of phone calls established to his satisfaction that the same craft had already been through the tunnel, though he was still adamant that it had to clear the gauge before he would let us in. In fact one of the legs did just touch the gauge - would have missed if we'd been a few inches over to the other side - but we had ample clearance (albeit only inches in some parts) all the way through after resetting the back actor boom to be lower than its normal travelling position. If your handrails are close to the gauge you might have to accept losing some paint on the way through as being part of the experience. Not the lowest point, but close. Tim Very helpfull thanks for your response and not just quoting the 5' 9'' as quoted in the books. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canal boat man Posted May 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2008 I'll admit I've not been through for (very) many years. But I'm over 6 foot, and stood on a cruiser stern I'm damn sure that at no point did I have to duck as much as a figure of 5 foot 9 inches implies. I think that figure must include a very hefty margin of error! Alan Thanks for your help. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now