Phoenix_V

1 no 2 no

1 The site mods haven't made their position clear. 2 Sorry but I am happy to discuss issues on this forum but i dont make personal remarks and i dont expect to receive same having been on here for some 5 years i dont take kindly to being rudely told by someone that appears to have been here 3 months to leave if i criticize one decision of the thousands the hardworking mods make

Fair enough thats probably not abuse in Yorkshire, doesnt lead to a very useful discussion though

The judgment wasnt removed to satisfy the court, if it was who could argue, but it wasnt nor were the other posts,I am entitled to express my opinion without your abuse.

Just for the record i posted the original text in full for 2 reasons one was admittedly because it did occur to me that it might "disappear" from the original site but secondly i read on here a while ago that people dont like postings straight to links but prefer a quote from them. This post was removed for understandable but obscure reasons. I DID NOT then repost it i posted a link to a reputable site which still then carried the text, I understand this has been done in the past where CWDF did not wish to carry contentious stuff but on this occasion it was again blocked no reason given, so i did not "insist on reposting" and find this comment offensive. By way of update I was at a meeting today when BW confirmed that they were waiting for an electronic version of the final text from the court and would then be released under the FOI act so i really cannot see any reason why the available draft cannot be available meantime as it is thanks to members of this forum.

I think you have just repeated yourself

Ooh is that a new rule too

I understand the reason for removing the original post. I thought it appropriate that other members knew too i still do. We now seem to have achieved that The judgment is now, possibly, thanks to other forum members sites, more widely available than it would have been so we have thwarted Mr Davies efforts at censorship. Still no reason given for the whole thread disappearing though or did he request that too.

I have been ordered not to but the words "requested" and "by Paul Davis solicitor" did appear Having looked at the forum rules I note the following "Moderators will always look at all available options before closing a topic. When closing a topic, moderators will always endeavour provide a detailed reason for doing so"

It got deleted though when i copied it to the thread and then the thread went one mod deleted the posts and another the whole thread, consistent, what?

Thats not how i read the pm from which I may not quote.

The original post was pulled in the morning, an explanation being given albeit by pm rather than on the forum, no explanation has been given as to why later that day the whole thread disappeared.

The draft was private but the final has now been issued so there is no obvious reason why that state of affairs should continue

It was the draft that was published on the K and A website so in that respect it probably was private but the final (unaltered as I understand it) version has now been issued so should now be available

I can understand removal of the judgement, none of the other canal web sites has it so I suspect they have all been got at. The question is why Mr Davies and BW both want it kept secret and why the whole thread was removed all the other sites continue to debate this important issue.

I posted the original copy of the judgment, I can understand why it was removed, I've not had any messages from the mods regarding removal of the whole thread so I can only assume it was for reasons other than the judgement. No doubt they will tell us soon?

No personal knowledge but wouldnt this do the job? link to phone tracking service

Right yes I see now, thanks, feel a bit silly really

Well yes it does thanks but how to relate that diagram to the unlabeled screw terminals on my photo of the unit is the problem?

Thanks I have the manual and the wiring at the boiler end is clear but the piece of paper with the roomstat was far from clear! hence the inquiry

There may well be a congestion issue around Braunston but in general there aint and a surplus of moorings is clearly a good thing in general for us boaters, Mr C has his own agenda as a marina owner

Wow thanks

Can anyone tell me which wire from the Alde (vertical old style) gas boiler goes to which screw terminal on the roomstat - please link to picture of back of stat below (sorry failed miserably to insert as an image) clicky

Has the full judgement been published please - if so where?

I didnt know that EA dont do them always assumed it worked both ways, in which case best to do through BW direct as although any agent can give you a receipt and they will be accepted by BW staff I think EA may not recognize them! next problem will be how long it takes BW to turn it round though