Jump to content

Hounslow mooring byelaws


NigelMoore

Featured Posts

Just brought to my attention – Hounslow are publishing their intention to introduce mooring byelaws.

Written representations are invited to be sent to :-

Mike Sudlow, Director, Asset Management & Major Projects, London Borough of Hounslow

michael.sudlow@hounslow.gov.uk

The relevant documentation can be found at :-

https://www.hounslow.gov.uk/downloads/download/432/byelaws_relating_to_moorings

 

Hounslow draft byelaws notice.jpg

 

Unfortunately the maps provided – as indeed the Schedule 1 list, do not cover all areas described in the news item. That specifically includes Brent river frontage alongside Boston Manor, and the byelaws relate to all riparian land “owned or managed” by the Council – what constitutes “managed by” is open to question in the absence of comprehensive plans.

 

While I have always advocated the byelaw approach to such control, in place of the usual and legally questionable civil proceedings usually taken (not to mention expensive – the Council claim it has cost them a half million pounds in court actions thus far), the lazy adoption of (part only) of the Richmond moorings byelaws is reprehensible and ridiculous. Only 1 hour stays are permitted unless prior agreement is obtained, which is scarcely enough for anyone to tie up long enough to do some shopping locally, and on the tidal sections (most of the area affected) would be impossible to comply with anyway, if stranded by low tides.

 

Anyone interested should put their oar in, with any suggested modifications.

Edited by NigelMoore
locate pic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the tide drops the levels, If the boat is sat on the bottom but not attached to the bank, is it moored???

 

Likewise if the boat is floating, but on an anchor, so near the bank but not attached to the bank is it moored as far as the council byelaws are concerned?

Edited by Chewbacka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The byelaw defines "moor" to include physically touching the land OR tied to it, so if they owned the bed, just sitting on the mud would count as mooring. However, the definition of land includes only that which is above mean high water.

 

Then again, "land" includes "any land owned or managed by the Council", so conceivably they could include the bed of the river over which they have a PLA riverworks licence perhaps? I doubt they have thought that far though, it is very lazy drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.