Sorry Matty, I didn't mean to take away any merit from you OP, I was replying to something else, hence the quote.
Personally I don't like the "look" of the boat and wouldn't be interested in it. I do take on-board your comments and they all made sense to me, you are one of a few on here that I do take heed of their comments about such things. By having a loose understanding of what you do for a living, if you were to make a comment on how a certain boat handles, or what design types are more efficient or safe I would take your advice. I did actually make a post shortly after your OP, stating that I didn't like it, especially the set up for the front ropes
Whereas if it came from MtB in reference to a WB I would take with a large grain of salt, as I'm pretty sure most folks appreciate his feelings on WB's in general. It was in one of his many WB posts that I was first introduced to the word "fugly" (MtB I do take heed of any posts you make in regards to boilers & plumbing, just to clarify)
I would ask this though...How/Why would a boat builder be convinced to build something that could and more than likely will cause damage to both locks and probably the boat? It can only end up with bad publicity for them in the long run. Why would they have not talked the designer out of such a design in the first place?