Jump to content

WotEver

PatronDonate to Canal World
  • Posts

    27,956
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    36

Posts posted by WotEver

  1. 2 hours ago, matty40s said:

    The starter I finally had to replace during lockdown May had a date of 2003 on it. I probably killed it myself by linking it to the domestic bank over the winter whilst on a landline rather than leave it be.

    I just had to change the original fitment battery on my 2007 S-Type, but only because the alternator failed; so starter batteries, even on cars, can last an awful long time.

  2. 1 hour ago, jenevers said:

    How??

    They are “stick on”...

    Then you can’t.
     

    Unfortunately (and I know you won’t want to hear this) stick-on panels are frequently reported (both here and elsewhere) to have a very short life. I suspect they don’t much care for the very hot steel they’re attached to. Whatever the cause, they never seem to last more than a handful of years. 

  3. 50 minutes ago, Machpoint005 said:

    I agree with the 'include a ruler' plea but in this case we can get some idea of the size from the battery isolator switch nameplate and the cross-head screw that holds it. It is bigger than 2BA, but certainly not 12mm. 

    Looks like M6 to me. 

  4. 8 hours ago, Chewbacka said:

    I think you have mis read the bss.

    You are correct that if you choose to use a “pre-made hose assemblies conforming to BS 669” then a bayonet connection must be used, however section 7.9.5 goes on to state that pre-made assemblies are optional and you may  “......use suitable nozzles secured by crimped or worm‐drive clips; and,”.  There then follows requirements about clip style, size etc.

     

    Therefore bayonet fittings are not required in all cases.

     

    At least that is how I read it.

    That would be far more logical so I suspect that you are correct. :)

     

    As I wrote to the OP, best to check with his examiner and then make his own choice. 

  5. 4 hours ago, Rick Savery said:

    That's interesting. At the moment I have a flexible hos with very short pieces of pipe at each end connecting the cooker to the main pipework.

     

    Having taken this off, does this mean that I have to now fit a bayonet fitting to the main pipework and get a hose with a bayonet fitting at one end and the short piece of pipe at the other which connects to the cooker directly ?

    Well, reading the BSS regs certainly suggests so as my quote demonstrated. However, I bet loads of boats have their cooker connected via a flex hose without a bayonet fitting. I know WotEver was plumbed without because I changed the cooker and there wasn’t one there. I guess a phone call to your BSS Examiner will clarify what he will and will not accept. 
     

    https://www.boatsafetyscheme.org/media/268789/ecp-private-boats-ed3_rev2_apr2015_public_final.pdf

  6. 1 hour ago, alias said:

    It probably is lack of local capacity.  As demand on a base station reaches capacity it will drop the weaker (usually more distant) connections to provide service to stronger/closer connections.  That can turn a poor reception area to a no reception area at times of high demand.

    You can always fix it yourself ;)

    Fed up villagers in Michaelston-y-Fedw install ultrafast broadband https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-44631791

  7. 20 hours ago, Ronaldo47 said:

    are bayonet connectors not allowed on boats?    

    Not only are they permitted but it appears that they are mandated if using a flexible hose to connect a cooker. 7.9.1 reads (in part):

     

    ... pre‐made hose assemblies conforming to BS 669 may be used to connect cookers to LPG supply pipework. Such hoses usually have a red stripe running along the length of the hose but may not be marked with BS669.


    The connections on such hoses must terminate with self-sealing bayonet connections at the connection points to the LPG supply pipework. The portable appliance connection checks at 7.10 also apply.

     

     

     

  8. 16 minutes ago, Jen-in-Wellies said:

    Multiply by 60 to go from Hz to revs per minute. 2600rpm should give a sharp frequency peak at 43.3Hz, Your microphone should pick this up, but if not, the next peak will be 86.7Hz (double).

    You know, I read this and thought to myself “What’s so magical about 60?”  It took a while for the penny to drop. Not enough coffee I think ;)

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.