This is related to my thread 'Am I wasting my time?' in 'living afloat', in that it has some bearing on my quest for a residential mooring....
Looking through previous posts on similar matters and trying to summarise my understanding regarding the non-towpath side of the canal, are these following assertions correct?
Unless BW can prove otherwise or the deeds of the land show otherwise, the landowner has the land up to the water's edge
The landowner, or a person with the landowner's permission can moor a boat against this bank of the canal.
The landowner may charge for the mooring, but BW can't.
BW have a reasonable right of access for essential maintenance.
As long as the boat is licensed, BW don't have powers of eviction or power to prevent the mooring.
The provision of facilities such as water, electricity, etc. are at the landowner's discretion (notwithstanding any planning permissions required).
Let me know if I'm way off track here!