I'm with Fuzzy on this. I know that you mean well, and I know that the upholding of certain rules ensures that we live in a world that is civilised and well-ordered, but the unqualified, unsubstantiated collection of random data will not be enough to make BW sit and take action against those you claim are flouting the regulations. To my mind, this is both divisive and ultimately futile in scope, you will have succeeded in causing argument amongst ourselves and to what end? The collection of disregardable evidence? When we're at school and a child complains about another we demand names and details so that we (as the people in charge) can take effective action. But, we're not in charge here, we just seem like a group of perpetual malcontents with a series of gripes.
If we're serious about this then numbers should be collected. But ...... we can't because we lack the necessary authority to do so. Moreover, there is a fear of intimidation and violence from some if we do; sometimes that's why BW haven't always been able to tackle some of the problems with long-term stayers and licence evaders. Of course we deplore evasion; given the effect it has on us all who wouldn't? However, in any community there are those who don't necessarily hold the same views about authority and how beholden we should be to it. In any case, it would be good to hear from Eugene about how BW view this and whether it might be considered by them as legitimate evidence in any way.
Regards, Jill