Jump to content

alan_fincher

Member
  • Posts

    38,278
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    81

Posts posted by alan_fincher

  1. I first encountered this boat probably about 11 years ago.

     

    We were making a descent from the Etruria summit on the Trent and Mersey, and Sarah was the next boat in the queue behind us.

     

    It may well be that its accommodation was not the most practical, but as Paul suggests it was more livable than a working boat back cabin.

     

    As for practicalities of navigation and working locks there didn't appear to be any great issues.

     

    Personally though in a boat claimed to be 1850s, (is it really?), I would prefer an engine a bit less modern than that Lister Petter unit, though it is unclear it there is space to fit something more interesting.  A Sabb, possibly???

  2. 3 hours ago, Siduller17 said:

    The current bathroom set up is very basic, with a sea toilet going straight into the canal due to the boat previously being moored on the thames, i think making it legal. 

     

    I don't think that can be correct.

    When I worked as part time labour for one of the Grand Union Canal hire boat firms right back in the early 1970s each narrow boat had a sea toilet.  Back then it was allowed on canals.

    However if the boat was going out for a passage on the Thames then the sea toilet had to be disabled, and a basic Elsan Bristol "Bucket and chuck it" loo was squeezed into the bathroom.

    So I would say on the non tidal thames sea toilets were outlawed even before the 1970s.

    • Greenie 1
  3. 31 minutes ago, MtB said:

    Indeed. This is the whole raison d'être for Basic-Boat insurance to exist in the first place! 

     

    Actually that's not quite the whole raison d'etre for basic cover.  Some owners who could go fully comp if they wanted to chose instead to "self insure".  OK, thee is a degree of gambling in doing that, but if nothing bad happens you can save a great deal of money over your ownership of the boat.

  4. 17 hours ago, Flibbertigibbet said:

    As predicted, the CRT now prefer the lazy method of "water management", which is close first, ask questions later.

     

    In ten years time, the canal system as we know it simply won't exist.

     

    If you know the magic answer to the question "How do you conjure up water when there is none?" I suggest you urgently tell CRT.

    You'd be doing us all a big favour!

    • Greenie 2
  5. 45 minutes ago, ditchcrawler said:

    I am sure someone on here can give an approximate age for reg 65517

    Not really, as it is one of the several original series, which despite being listed as 1980/1981, really means  1980/81 or any date earlier.

    • Greenie 1
  6. On 03/08/2025 at 07:23, magnetman said:

    Classy Boat that. One I always did like. 

     

     

    9680778.jpg

     

     

    Yes, but assuming it has not changed ownership since 2014, I wish any new prospective purchaser.

    I hope the seller is actually prepared to sell once you think you have struck a bargain.

    Back in 2014 he wasted a good 6 months of our time, during which other possible candidate boats for us had come and gone.

     

    More detail in this blog post....

     

    https://sickleandflamingo.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-ones-that-got-away-number-2-ajax.html

    4 minutes ago, Tonka said:

    You are correct.

    Weired because it worked the other day

     

    If it is the same owner as in 2014 he might very well have changed his mind and deleted the advert!

  7. On 01/08/2025 at 21:47, GUMPY said:

    Is The Ship the thatched one near the Red Lion at Maffers?

    I didn't think you were old enough to remember that 😨

    Talking of which the Red Lion appears to have had a fire, hope it reopens.

     

    Reopening on Wednesday, apparently.

  8. 3 hours ago, IanM said:

    I'm not entirely convinced that will last particularly long!

     

    1 hour ago, matty40s said:

    Well, theres at least 20 more similar balance beams on the GU between Brentford and Stoke Bruerne so give it a chance.

     

    Quite:

    Every single lock on the Marsworth flight had one of these last time I walked down the flight.

    I'm not convinced Tim's picture is the real problem.

    This is what has been claimed elsewhere, and seems far more consistent with a very nasty boat impact.

    No photo description available.

    • Sad 1
    • Unimpressed 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.