Jump to content

Laurence Hogg

Member
  • Posts

    4,975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Laurence Hogg

  1. I thought I sent you all the details you need for this? Did you not get them? Irrespective of the cabin shape line widths and layout remain the same unless it was docked at Bradley who had their own version!

  2. Its a GWR nameplate which was removed when the owner sold the craft on. Peacock now rots away at the BCLM underused and like so many other floating exhibits in musuems would be better preserved on the hard in a building or covered area.

  3. All Bantocks were horse boats, none were intended to be butty's when built. Anything converted will have no relation to the original hull as intended. Don't forget the original Bantock boats were composite but with a wooden lower strake in the side.

  4. There is no fully restored Bantock around. No one knows the livery or exact detail of these boats when in service. A couple of pictures exist of GWR ones but these are not in colour.

    Whilst the designs are well known scant detail is available.

  5. 9 hours ago, Heartland said:

    Like Purton there were some abandoned craft near the entrance to the Lydney Canal

    Were they ever identified?

    There was a longboat/ narrow boat there

    47409.jpg

    Very good picture, haven't seen that before. The motor is ex GUCCCo "Pleione" which broke off its tow and ended up there, it has since been wrecked and a salvage attempt many years ago pulled it to bits, today only the engine beds are identifiable at certain tides. Theres plenty of "spare parts" in the rocks, ie knees etc. Alan Brown (late) identified the boat from a recovered gunwale gauging marker plate. The three pictures below date from the mid 1980's, today only the engine beds are visible (usually visible on google earth). Last image shows the engine beds in the mud from todays GE image.

    LYDNEY MB REMAINS ENGINE BEDS STERN POST.jpg

    LYDNEY WRECKED NARROWBOAT SIDE.jpg

    LYDNEY WRECK.jpg

    Image1.jpg

  6. On ‎20‎/‎06‎/‎2017 at 06:52, Derek R. said:

    Maybe just one man's methods. A chain slipped over the hook may have seen to be a simpler solution to tying off. Wouldn't do much for paint when dropping it on the butties foredeck though.

    Many BCN tugs towed with variations, they used chains or multiple hitches to attach the lines when towing multiple boats.

    TUG CRESWELL PRATTS BRIDGE.jpg

  7. 52 minutes ago, ditchcrawler said:

    We have just come up the Cheshire lock and the lock wall behind the bottom gate looks to have a false wooden front on it. This is only on the side of the island between the two locks. This set me thinking,did they once have a paddle between the two chambers like at Hillmorton to save water?

    DSCF8188small.jpg

    Absolutely correct. Some were still in situ in the late 70's and early 80's. Very good way of saving water providing they were used sensibly.

  8. 20 hours ago, AMModels said:

    PC%2003b%20Water%20Rambler%20passing%20t

    PC%2003a%20Water%20Rambler02%20approachi

    Heres Water Rambler as described with cut down top bends.  From the late Jim Paylers collection as seen on Blisworth.com and my site.

    This is "Water Rambler" in her second guise. The original conversion retained the full height bow but was found to obstruct the forward view so remedial action was taken after the first year and part of the "top bend" and the bow removed as seen here. A commercial postcard exists of the boat as originally built: large.5933f2849c764_WATERRAMBLERPOSTCARD

     

    also two pictures in the BW collection:

    http://collections.canalrivertrust.org.uk/bw192.2.4.1

    http://collections.canalrivertrust.org.uk/bw192.2.4.2

  9. I really don't know what all the fuss is about.

    Its a great idea and should have been done years ago.

    However there's nothing to worry about CRT doesn't have enough enforcement officers and staff to cope now and certainly will not have enough to implement this. Come the worst where are they going to put the "inpounded" offenders craft?

    They could bring in third parties....

    Wait for the "show" case to happen then it will fade away just like most good ideas do in CRT & former BW.

  10. 13 minutes ago, David Schweizer said:

    How come you can all view the film? My computer will not allow me to watch without subscribing to BFI player, which I presume costs!

    It is free to subscribe, you get a newsletter about new finds etc.

    • Greenie 1
  11. I agree Andy far too tidy. Is this the result of the £free money" running out (HLF etc?). Their trainees seem to have flown too. Maybe the "friends" of CRT could get involved..........

    • Greenie 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.